Cited by 32

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Principles of anti‐oppression: A critical analytic synthesis

Peters, Harvey Charles, Luke, Melissa·2022·Counselor Education and Supervision

Abstract

This study reports post‐structural qualitative research that critically examined, analyzed, and synthesized the anti‐oppression scholarship in counseling and related disciplines. The systematic Critical Analytic Synthesis resulted in the development of 10 principles of anti‐oppression. We discuss the principles in light of extant scholarship and identify limitations and implications.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ceas.12251

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. 10.1146/annurev.so.17.080191.000541 · DOI
  2. 10.1080/15401383.2019.1632767 · DOI
  3. 10.4324/9781315231747 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1037/amp0000905 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/jmcd.12092 · DOI
  6. 10.1080/21501378.2018.1562845 · DOI
  7. 10.1002/jcad.12427 · DOI
  8. Esposito J., 2021, Introduction to intersectional qualitative research
  9. 10.7290/tsc030204 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/978-1-4939-1283-4 · DOI
  11. 10.7290/tsc030201 · DOI
  12. 10.1002/ceas.12027 · DOI
  13. Hays D. G., 2023, Qualitative inquiry in clinical and educational settings
  14. 10.1111/jmft.12299 · DOI
  15. Kovach M., 2021, Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts
  16. 10.2307/1170593 · DOI
  17. Limberg D., 2021, Examining the use of Consensual Qualitative Research in counseling research, Journal of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research, 15, 220
  18. Miles M. B., 2020, Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook
  19. 10.1002/jmcd.12209 · DOI
  20. Mullaly B., 2017, Challenging Oppression and confronting privilege: A critical social work approach
  21. 10.1002/ceas.12029 · DOI
  22. 10.1891/RTNP‐2021‐0014 · DOI
  23. 10.1007/s10447‐017‐9290‐2 · DOI
  24. Peters H. C. Bruner S. Luke M. Dipre K. &Goodrich K.(2022).Integrated Supervision Framework: A multicultural social justice and ecological approach. Canadian Psychology.Advance online publication.https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000342 · DOI
  25. Peters H. C. Chan C. &Starkweather H.(2022).Counseling leadership: Examining race and racism using social constructionism. Journal of Counselor Leadership and Advocacy.Advance online publication.https://doi.org/10.1080/2326716X.2022.2087572 · DOI
  26. 10.1080/2326716X.2020.1854133 · DOI
  27. 10.1080/2326716X.2021.1875341 · DOI
  28. 10.1177/0011000020937431 · DOI
  29. 10.1002/jmcd.12035 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Saldaña J., 2021, The coding manual for qualitative researchers
  31. 10.1002/jcad.12321 · DOI
  32. 10.1002/jcad.12318 · DOI
  33. 10.1080/15401383.2020.1740633 · DOI
  34. 10.1080/21501378.2021.1922075 · DOI
  35. 10.1002/ceas.12201 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1177/1476750315622542 · DOI
  37. 10.1111/bjso.12405 · DOI
  38. 10.1002/ceas.12215 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Winkle‐Wagner R., 2019, Critical theory and qualitative data analysis in education
  40. 10.1037/0022‐0167.54.4.351 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 32

Metadata

Authors
Peters, H. C., & Luke, M.
Affiliations
  • Department of Counseling and Human Development The George Washington University Washington District of Columbia USA
  • Department of Counseling and Human Services Syracuse University Syracuse New York USA
Venue
Counselor Education and Supervision
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-11-09
Volume
61
Issue
4
Pages
335-348
ISSN
  • 0011-0035
  • 1556-6978
Cited by
32
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review