Cited by 1Doping in SportsMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry StudiesPharmacological Effects and Assays

Investigation of the Physiological and Post-training Effects of Ecdysteroid Supplementation by Multivariate Analysis of the Human Serum Metabolome

Leogrande, Patrizia, Jardines, Daniel, Brito, Dayamin Martinez, de la Torre, Xavier, Botrè, Francesco, Luch, Andreas, Diel, Patrick, Parr, Maria Kristina·2024·Journal of Chemometrics

Abstract

This work aims to characterize the serum profile of athletes after the administration of ecdysteroids, natural steroid hormones recently reported to enhance athletic performance. The combination of mass spectrometry and chemometric tools may allow to differentiate physiological effects from post‐training and intake‐driven effects. Serum samples were collected from 46 healthy male volunteers and divided into four groups: control (two capsules/day of Peak Ecdysone without training), placebo (two capsules without ecdysteroids with training), Ec1 (two capsules/day Peak Ecdysone with training), and Ec2 (eight capsules/day Peak Ecdysone with training). Metabolic profiling was measured using a SCIEX Triple Quadrupole LC‐MS/MS system coupled with the Biocrates AbsoluteIDQ p180 kit, which allows quantitation of a large panel of metabolites that were subjected to multivariate analysis. Unsupervised analysis of the data found no significant differences between the placebo and the ecdysteroid supplementation groups. By merging Ec1 and Ec2 into a single group, coded as treated, a clear discrimination between the control and placebo groups was observed. Phosphatidylcholines were among the most significant features of ecdysteroids administration, showing a dose‐dependent effect in Ec1 and Ec2 groups. As specific metabolic phenotypes can result from years of training, the discrimination of physiological effects from those caused by the administration of banned substances can be a valuable analytical strategy for the interpretation of adverse analytical findings in the anti‐doping field.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cem.3594

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leogrande, P., Jardines, D., Brito, D. M., de la Torre, X., Botrè, F., Luch, A., Diel, P., & Parr, M. K.
Affiliations
  • Federazione Medico Sportiva Italiana (IT)
  • Laboratorio Antidoping Federazione Medico Sportiva Italiana Rome Italy
  • German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) (DE)
  • German Sport University Cologne (DE)
  • Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Venue
Journal of Chemometrics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-08-02
Volume
38
Issue
11
ISSN
  • 0886-9383 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-128X
OpenAlex
W4401261653
Cited by
1
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 1
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Chemometrics (publishedVersion)
Funders
World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA 15C18MP)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Doping in Sports
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Pharmacological Effects and Assays
Keywords
ecdysteroids, dietary supplements, serum metabolome, athletes, phosphatidylcholine, dose-dependent effects, training effects, anti-doping, doping detection, metabolite profiling, multivariate analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review