Cited by 548Computational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in Materials ScienceHistory and advancements in chemistry

Neural‐Symbolic Machine Learning for Retrosynthesis and Reaction Prediction

Segler, Marwin H. S., Waller, Mark P.·2017·Chemistry – A European Journal

Abstract

Reaction prediction and retrosynthesis are the cornerstones of organic chemistry. Rule‐based expert systems have been the most widespread approach to computationally solve these two related challenges to date. However, reaction rules often fail because they ignore the molecular context, which leads to reactivity conflicts. Herein, we report that deep neural networks can learn to resolve reactivity conflicts and to prioritize the most suitable transformation rules. We show that by training our model on 3.5 million reactions taken from the collective published knowledge of the entire discipline of chemistry, our model exhibits a top10‐accuracy of 95 % in retrosynthesis and 97 % for reaction prediction on a validation set of almost 1 million reactions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/chem.201605499

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Segler, M. H. S., & Waller, M. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Münster (DE)
  • Shanghai University (CN)
Corresponding author
Waller, Mark P.
Venue
Chemistry – A European Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-02-22
Volume
23
Issue
25
Pages
5966-5971
ISSN
  • 0947-6539 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-3765
OpenAlex
W2580919858
Cited by
548
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 77 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 12
FWCI
36.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chemistry - A European Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB858 - Z1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › History and advancements in chemistry
Keywords
retrosynthesis, chemical reaction prediction, organic chemistry, transformation rules, rule prioritization, deep neural network, chemical reaction data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review