Cited by 536Computational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in Materials ScienceHistory and advancements in chemistry

Retrosynthetic Reaction Prediction Using Neural Sequence-to-Sequence Models

Open access
Liu, Bowen, Ramsundar, Bharath, Kawthekar, Prasad, Shi, Jade, Gomes, Joseph, Luu Nguyen, Quang, Ho, Stephen, Sloane, Jack +2 more·2017·ACS Central Science

Abstract

We describe a fully data driven model that learns to perform a retrosynthetic reaction prediction task, which is treated as a sequence-to-sequence mapping problem. The end-to-end trained model has an encoder-decoder architecture that consists of two recurrent neural networks, which has previously shown great success in solving other sequence-to-sequence prediction tasks such as machine translation. The model is trained on 50,000 experimental reaction examples from the United States patent literature, which span 10 broad reaction types that are commonly used by medicinal chemists. We find that our model performs comparably with a rule-based expert system baseline model, and also overcomes certain limitations associated with rule-based expert systems and with any machine learning approach that contains a rule-based expert system component. Our model provides an important first step toward solving the challenging problem of computational retrosynthetic analysis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acscentsci.7b00303

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sequence-to-sequence models applied to chemical reactions provided similar performance (ca 37% for top-1) to rule-based systems (35%).

    “This methodology was applied to model reaction products and for retrosynthetic reaction route prediction, which provided similar performance (ca 37% for top-1) to rule-based systems (35%).140”

    From QSAR without borders (2020) · cites this paper as [140]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bjerrum E. J. SMILES Enumeration as Data Augmentation for Neural Network Modeling of Molecules. arXiv 2017, 1703.07076.
  2. Abadi M.; Agarwal A.; Barham P.; Brevdo E.; Chen Z.; Citro C.; Corrado G. S.; Davis A.; Dean J.; Devin M. TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systems. arXiv 2015, 1603.04467.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, B., Ramsundar, B., Kawthekar, P., Shi, J., Gomes, J., Luu Nguyen, Q., Ho, S., Sloane, J., Wender, P., & Pande, V.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Department of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States
Corresponding author
Pande, Vijay
Venue
ACS Central Science
Published
2017-09-05
Volume
3
Issue
10
Pages
1103-1113
ISSN
  • 2374-7943 (ISSN-L)
  • 2374-7951
OpenAlex
W2621742623
Cited by
536
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 79 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 3
FWCI
30.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACS Central Science (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Division of Chemistry (CHE1265956)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U19 AI109662)
  • American Cancer Society (PF-15-007-01-CDD)
  • Hertz Foundation
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01 GM062868)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › History and advancements in chemistry
Keywords
retrosynthesis, chemical reaction prediction, sequence-to-sequence models, encoder-decoder architecture, recurrent neural networks, patent literature, rule-based expert systems, medicinal chemistry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review