Cited by 21Cellular transport and secretionMicrotubule and mitosis dynamicsCellular Mechanics and Interactions

Directed motility of phagosomes inTetrahymena thermophila requires actin and Myo1p, a novel unconventional myosin

Hosein, Roland E., Williams, Selwyn A., Gavin, R. H.·2005·Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton

Abstract

The phagosome cycle was investigated in Tetrahymena thermophila, which had internalized fluorescent latex beads. Confocal microscopy of cells from a GFP-actin strain revealed actin filaments that extended 3-5 mum from the periphery of fluorescent phagosomes. In GFP-actin cells and in wild-type cells, motility of fluorescent phagosomes was directed from the oral cavity to the posterior end of the cell. Although 60% of fluorescent phagosomes in the MYO1-knockout strain were motile, movement of phagosomes was not directed toward the posterior end of the cell and was random. Forty percent of fluorescent phagosomes in knockout cells were non-motile in contrast to only 20% non-motile phagosomes in wild-type cells. The increased incidence of non-motile phagosomes in the knockout strain could reflect absence of Myo1p as a motor. Another myosin or other molecular motors could power random movement of phagosomes in the MYO1-knockout strain. In latrunculin-treated GFP-actin cells, movement of fluorescent phagosomes was random. Average velocity of random movement of fluorescent phagosomes in the knockout strain and in latrunculin-treated cells was statistically the same as the average velocity (2.0 +/- 1.9 microm/min) of phagosomes in GFP-actin cells. These findings are an indication that dynamic actin and Myo1p are required for directed motility of phagosomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cm.20065

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hosein, R. E., Williams, S. A., & Gavin, R. H.
Affiliations
Brooklyn College (US)
Corresponding author
Gavin, R. H.
Venue
Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005
Volume
61
Issue
1
Pages
49-60
ISSN
  • 0886-1544 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0169
OpenAlex
W2072087299
Cited by
21
References
56
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
Keywords
Tetrahymena thermophila, unconventional myosins, F-actin, latrunculin, ciliate feeding, molecular motors
MeSH terms
Actins, Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Microspheres, Phagosomes, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Thiazoles, Nocodazole, Protozoan Proteins, Cell Polarity, Tetrahymena thermophila, Microscopy, Confocal, Myosin Heavy Chains, Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic, Animals, Genetically Modified, Thiazolidines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review