The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cell distribution of stress fibres in response to the geometry of the adhesive environment
Abstract
Cells display a large variety of shapes when plated in classical culture conditions despite their belonging to a common cell type. These shapes are transitory, since cells permanently disassemble and reassemble their cytoskeleton while moving. Adhesive micropatterns are commonly used to confine cell shape within a given geometry. In addition the micropattern can be designed so as to impose cells to spread upon adhesive and nonadhesive areas. Modulation of the pattern geometry allows the analysis of the mechanisms governing the determination of cell shape in response to external adhesive conditions. In this study, we show that the acquisition of cell shape follows two stages where initially the cell forms contact with the micropattern. Here, the most distal contacts made by the cell with the micropattern define the apices of the cell shape. Then secondly, the cell borders that link two apices move so as to minimise the distance between the two apices. In these cell borders, the absence of an underlying adhesive substrate is overcome by stress fibres forming between the apices, which in turn are marked by an accumulation of focal adhesions. By inhibiting myosin function, cell borders on nonadhesive zones become more concave, suggesting that the stress fibres work against the membrane tension in the cell border. Moreover, this suggested that traction forces are unevenly distributed in stationary, nonmigrating, cells. By comparing the stress fibres in cells with one, two, or three nonadherent cell borders it was reasoned that stress fibre strength is inversely proportional to number. We conclude that cells of a given area can generate the same total sum of tractional forces but that these tractional forces are differently spaced depending on the spatial distribution of its adherence contacts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wound healing recapitulates morphogenesis in Drosophila embryos
Wood, W., Jacinto, A., Grose, R., Woolner, S., Gale, J., Wilson, C., & Martin, P. (2002) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb875 · Cited by 435
Cited by
Environmental sensing through focal adhesions
Geiger, B., Spatz, J. P., & Bershadsky, A. D. (2009) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2593 · Cited by 2,543
Geometric cues for directing the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells
Kilian, K. A., Bugarija, B., Lahn, B. T., & Mrksich, M. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0903269107 · Cited by 1,841
Actin Dynamics, Architecture, and Mechanics in Cell Motility
Blanchoin, L., Boujemaa-Paterski, R., Sykes, C., & Plastino, J. (2014) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00018.2013 · Cited by 1,457
Micropatterning as a tool to decipher cell morphogenesis and functions
Théry, M. (2010) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.075150 · Cited by 730
Self-citationSpatial organization of the extracellular matrix regulates cell–cell junction positioning
Tseng, Q., Duchemin-Pelletier, E., Deshiere, A., Balland, M., Guillou, H., Filhol, O., & Théry, M. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1106377109 · Cited by 594
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Théry, M., Pépin, A., Dressaire, E., Chen, Y., & Bornens, M.
- Venue
- Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 341-355
- ISSN
- 0886-1544 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0169
- OpenAlex
- W2030041577
- Cited by
- 460
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.