Cited by 580Cellular Mechanics and InteractionsMarine Sponges and Natural ProductsMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics

Latrunculins—novel marine macrolides that disrupt microfilament organization and affect cell growth: I. Comparison with cytochalasin D

Spector, Ilan, Shochet, Nava R., Blasberger, Dina, Kashman, Yoel·1989·Cell Motility

Abstract

The latrunculins are architecturally novel marine compounds isolated from the Red Sea sponge Latrunculia magnifica. In vivo, they alter cell shape, disrupt microfilament organization, and inhibit the microfilament‐mediated processes of fertilization and early development. In vitro, latrunculin A was recently found to affect the polymerization of pure actin in a manner consistent with the formation of a 1:1 molar complex with G‐actin. These in vitro effects as well as previous indications that the latrunculins are more potent than the cytochalasins suggest differences in the in vivo mode of action of the two clases of drugs. To elucidate these differences we have compared the short‐ and long‐term effects of latrunculins on cell shape and actin organization to those of cytochalasin D. Exposure of hamster fibroblast NIL8 cells for 1–3 hr to latrunculin A, latrunculin B, and cytochalasin D causes concentration‐dependent changes in cell shape and actin organization. However, the latrunculin‐induced changes were strikingly different from those induced by cytochalasin D. Furthermore, while initial effects were manifest with both latrunculin A and cytochalasin D already at concentrations of about 0.03 μg/ml, latrunculin A caused complete rounding up of all cells at 0.2 μg/ml, whereas with cytochalasin D maximum contraction was reached at concentrations 10–20 times higher. The short‐term effects of latrunculin B were similar to those of latrunculin A although latrunculin B was slightly less potent. All three drugs inhibited cytokinesis in synchronized cells, but their long‐term effects were markedly different. NIL8 cells treated with latrunculin A maintained their altered state for extended periods. In contrast, the effects of cytochalasin D progressed with time in culture, and the latrunculin B‐induced changes were transient in the continued presence of the drug. These transient effects were found to be due to a gradual inactivation of latrunculin B by serum and were used to compare recovery patterns of cell shape and actin organization in two different cell lines. This comparison showed that the transient effects of latrunculin B were fully reversible for the NIL8 cells and not for the mouse neuroblastoma N1E‐115 cells.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cm.970130302

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Latrunculins bind to G-actin in a 1:1 molar complex, thereby limiting the availability of actin monomers for polymerizing at either barbed or pointed ends of actin filaments.

    “Latrunculins bind to G-actin in a 1:1 molar complex, thereby limiting the availability of actin monomers for polymerizing at either barbed or pointed ends of actin filaments (4).”
  • Low concentrations of AAIs (0.01-1 μM) are similar to those shown previously to alter actin filament organization in cultured cells, prevent lamellipodial ruffling in fibroblasts, inhibit motility and retrograde flow in neuronal growth cones, and arrest dendritic spine motility in hippocampal neurons.

    “The concentrations of latrunculin A and cytochalasins used here (0.01–1 μM) are similar to those that have been shown previously to alter actin filament organization in cultured cells, prevent lamellipodial ruffling in fibroblasts, inhibit motility and retrograde flow in neuronal growth cones, and arrest dendritic spine motility in hippocampal neurons (3, 4, 7, 10).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spector, I., Shochet, N. R., Blasberger, D., & Kashman, Y.
Affiliations
  • State University of New York (US)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
Spector, Ilan
Venue
Cell Motility
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1989-01
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
127-144
ISSN
0886-1544 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2012652910
Cited by
580
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 16
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM 32776)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Marine Sponges and Natural Products
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
Keywords
latrunculin, latrunculin A, latrunculin B, cytochalasin D, marine macrolides, actin polymerization, microfilament organization, cell shape, cytokinesis inhibition, actin cytoskeleton, reversible drug effects, N1E-115 neuroblastoma cells
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Division, Cells, Cultured, Cytochalasins, Cytoskeleton, Cricetinae, Actin Cytoskeleton, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Thiazoles, Time Factors, Cytochalasin D, Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic, Mice, Thiazolidines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review