Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 756

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An estimate of premature cancer mortality in the U.S. due to inadequate doses of solar ultraviolet‐B radiation

Open access
Grant, William B.·2002·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are large geographic gradients in mortality rates for a number of cancers in the U.S. (e.g., rates are approximately twice as high in the northeast compared with the southwest). Risk factors such as diet fail to explain this variation. Previous studies have demonstrated that the geographic distributions for five types of cancer are related inversely to solar radiation. The purpose of the current study was to determine how many types of cancer are affected by solar radiation and how many premature deaths from cancer occur due to insufficient ultraviolet (UV)‐B radiation. METHODS: UV‐B data for July 1992 and cancer mortality rates in the U.S. for between 1970–1994 were analyzed in an ecologic study. RESULTS: The findings of the current study confirm previous results that solar UV‐B radiation is associated with reduced risk of cancer of the breast, colon, ovary, and prostate as well as non‐Hodgkin lymphoma. Eight additional malignancies were found to exhibit an inverse correlation between mortality rates and UV‐B radiation: bladder, esophageal, kidney, lung, pancreatic, rectal, stomach, and corpus uteri. The annual number of premature deaths from cancer due to lower UV‐B exposures was 21,700 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 20,400–23,400) for white Americans, 1400 (95% CI, 1100–1600) for black Americans, and 500 (95% CI, 400–600) for Asian Americans and other minorities. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study demonstrate that much of the geographic variation in cancer mortality rates in the U.S. can be attributed to variations in solar UV‐B radiation exposure. Thus, many lives could be extended through increased careful exposure to solar UV‐B radiation and more safely, vitamin D3 supplementation, especially in nonsummer months. Cancer 2002;94:1867–75. © 2002 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.10427

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.10427

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 42 references

Cited by

See all 756

Metadata

Authors
Grant, W. B.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-03-15
Volume
94
Issue
6
Pages
1867-1875
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W2090239878
Cited by
756
References
42
FWCI
40.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An estimate of premature cancer mortality in the U.S. due to inadequate doses of solar ultraviolet‐B radiation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.10427
The paper
Grant, W. B. (2002). An estimate of premature cancer mortality in the U.S. due to inadequate doses of solar ultraviolet‐B radiation. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.10427

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.