CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 229Cancer survivorship and careAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer: Validation of a new scale to measure anxiety in men with prostate cancer

Open access
Roth, Andrew J., Rosenfeld, Barry, Kornblith, Alice B., Gibson, Christopher, Scher, Howard I., Curley‐Smart, Tracy, Holland, Jimmie C., Breitbart, William·2003·Cancer
DOI 10.1002/cncr.11386
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The psychological difficulties facing men with prostate cancer are acknowledged widely, yet identifying men who may benefit from mental health treatment has proven to be a challenging task. The authors developed the Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer (MAX‐PC) to facilitate the identification and assessment of men with prostate cancer‐related anxiety. This scale consists of three subscales that measure general prostate cancer anxiety, anxiety related to prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels in particular, and fear of recurrence. METHODS: Ambulatory men with prostate cancer ( n = 385 patients) were recruited from clinics throughout the United States. Prior to routine PSA tests, participants completed a baseline assessment packet that included the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; the Distress Thermometer; the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scale, Prostate Module; and measures of role functioning, sleep, and urinary functioning. PSA values from the last three tests also were collected. Follow‐up evaluation was completed within 2 weeks after patients learned of their PSA test result using a subset of these scales. RESULTS: Analysis of the MAX‐PC revealed a high degree of internal consistency and test‐retest reliability for the total score and for the three subscales, although reliability was somewhat weaker for the PSA Anxiety Scale. Concurrent validity was demonstrated by correlations between the MAX‐PC and measures of anxiety. Overall changes in PSA levels were correlated only modestly with changes in MAX‐PC scores (correlation coefficient, 0.13; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The MAX‐PC appears to be a valid and reliable measure of anxiety in men with prostate cancer receiving ambulatory care. Cancer 2003;97:2910–8. © 2003 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.11386

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.11386

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Roth A, 1998, Psycho‐oncology, 39
  2. 10.1002/1097-0142(19930201)71:3 <1138::AID-CNCR2820711436>3.0.CO;2-7 · DOI
  3. Roth A, 1996, Anxiety in men with prostate cancer may interfere with effective management of the disease, Primary Care Cancer., 16, 30
  4. Kash KM, 1995, Development of an instrument to measure breast cancer anxiety
  5. Cella DF, 1997, F.A.C.I.T. manual:manual of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Scales
  6. Holland JC, 1992, A sociodemographic data collection model for cooperative clinical trials, Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol., 11, 157

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 229

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Roth, A. J., Rosenfeld, B., Kornblith, A. B., Gibson, C., Scher, H. I., Curley‐Smart, T., Holland, J. C., & Breitbart, W.
Affiliations
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Fordham University (US)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Roth, Andrew J.
ORCID
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-05-19
Volume
97
Issue
11
Pages
2910-2918
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
DOI
10.1002/cncr.11386
OpenAlex
W2037331044
Cited by
229
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 12
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
PepsiCo
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Keywords
prostate cancer, anxiety, prostate-specific antigen, fear of recurrence, anxiety assessment scales, psychometric validation, scale reliability, scale validity, men's mental health
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Manifest Anxiety Scale, Prostatic Neoplasms, Prostate-Specific Antigen

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review