The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Chemotherapy‐induced neutropenia: Risks, consequences, and new directions for its management
Open accessAbstract
Cytotoxic chemotherapy suppresses the hematopoietic system, impairing host protective mechanisms and limiting the doses of chemotherapy that can be tolerated. Neutropenia, the most serious hematologic toxicity, is associated with the risk of life‐threatening infections as well as chemotherapy dose reductions and delays that may compromise treatment outcomes. The authors reviewed the recent literature to provide an update on research in chemotherapy‐induced neutropenia and its complications and impact, and they discuss the implications of this work for improving the management of patients with cancer who are treated with myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Despite its importance as the primary dose‐limiting toxicity of chemotherapy, much concerning neutropenia and its consequences and impact remains unknown. Recent surveys indicate that neutropenia remains a prevalent problem associated with substantial morbidity, mortality, and costs. Much research has sought to identify risk factors that may predispose patients to neutropenic complications, including febrile neutropenia, in an effort to predict better which patients are at risk and to use preventive strategies, such as prophylactic colony‐stimulating factors, more cost‐effectively. Neutropenic complications associated with myelosuppressive chemotherapy are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, possibly compromised treatment outcomes, and excess healthcare costs. Research in quantifying the risk of neutropenic complications may make it possible in the near future to target patients at greater risk with appropriate preventive strategies, thereby maximizing the benefits and minimizing the costs. Cancer 2004;100:228–37. © 2003 American Cancer Society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Immunostimulation with chemotherapy in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors
Galluzzi, L., Humeau, J., Buqué, A., Zitvogel, L., & Kroemer, G. (2020) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-020-0413-z · Cited by 1,349
The intestinal microbiota: Antibiotics, colonization resistance, and enteric pathogens
Kim, S., Covington, A., & Pamer, E. G. (2017) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/imr.12563 · Cited by 741
Flowers, C. R., Seidenfeld, J., Bow, E. J., Karten, C., Gleason, C., Hawley, D. K., Kuderer, N. M., Langston, A. A., Marr, K. A., Rolston, K. V. I., et al. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2012.45.8661 · Cited by 448
The immune response to secondary necrotic cells
Sachet, M., Liang, Y. Y., & Oehler, R. (2017) · Apoptosis · doi:10.1007/s10495-017-1413-z · Cited by 282
Engineered in-situ depot-forming hydrogels for intratumoral drug delivery
Fakhari, A., & Anand Subramony, J. (2015) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.11.014 · Cited by 164
Metadata
- Authors
- Crawford, J., Dale, D. C., & Lyman, G. H.
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-01-05
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 228-237
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- OpenAlex
- W1546909751
- Cited by
- 882
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chemotherapy‐induced neutropenia: Risks, consequences, and new directions for its management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.11882
- The paper
- Crawford, J., Dale, D. C., & Lyman, G. H. (2004). Chemotherapy‐induced neutropenia: Risks, consequences, and new directions for its management. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11882
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.