The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Partner‐assisted emotional disclosure for patients with gastrointestinal cancer: Results from a randomized controlled trial
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: For patients with cancer who are married or in an intimate relationship, their relationships with their partners play a critical role in their adaptation to illness. However, cancer patients and their partners often have difficulty in talking with each other about their cancer‐related concerns. Difficulties in communication ultimately may compromise both the patient‐partner relationship and the patient's psychological adjustment. The current study tested the efficacy of a novel partner‐assisted emotional disclosure intervention in a sample of patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. METHODS: One hundred thirty patients with GI cancer and their partners were assigned randomly to receive 4 sessions of either partner‐assisted emotional disclosure or a couples cancer education/support intervention. Patients and partners completed measures of relationship quality, intimacy with their partner, and psychological distress before randomization and at the end of the intervention sessions. Data were analyzed using multilevel modeling. RESULTS: Compared with an education/support condition, the partner‐assisted emotional disclosure condition led to improvements in relationship quality and intimacy for couples in which the patient initially reported higher levels of holding back from discussing cancer‐related concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Partner‐assisted emotional disclosure is a novel intervention that builds on both the private emotional disclosure and the cognitive‐behavioral marital literature. The results of this study suggested that this intervention may be beneficial for couples in which the patient tends to hold back from discussing concerns. The authors concluded that future research on methods of enhancing the effects of partner‐assisted emotional disclosure is warranted. Cancer 2009;115(18 suppl):4326–38. © 2009 American Cancer Society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The education/support condition was tested in our pilot feasibility trial [23] and is similar to controls in other cancer trials [34, 35].”
From Protocol of a randomized trial of acceptance and commitment therapy for fatigue interference in metastatic breast cancer (2020) · cites this paper as [35]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Twelve studies (13 reports because of one pair of publications from the same RCT 42 , 43 ) lacked sufficient data or had incompatible designs (e.g., re‐randomization, multiple overlapping intervention arms) and were included only in the narrative synthesis”
From Nonpharmacologic interventions for managing distress, anxiety, and depression for patients with cancer and their family caregivers: A systematic review and meta‐analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [42]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2006) · Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics · doi:10.3102/10769986031004437 · Cited by 5,044
(2006) · Cited by 3,705
Jemal, A., Murray, T., Samuels, A., Ghafoor, A., Ward, E., & Thun, M. J. (2003) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.53.1.5 · Cited by 3,275
Writing About Emotional Experiences as a Therapeutic Process
Pennebaker, J. W. (1997) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00403.x · Cited by 2,486
Measuring Marital Quality: A Critical Look at the Dependent Variable
Norton, R. W. (1983) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/351302 · Cited by 1,802
Written emotional expression: Effect sizes, outcome types, and moderating variables
Smyth, J. M. (1998) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.66.1.174 · Cited by 1,294
Written emotional expression: Effect sizes, outcome types, and moderating variables.
Smyth, J. M. (1998) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.66.1.174 · Cited by 1,290
Antoni, M. H., Lehman, J. M., Kilbourn, K. M., Boyers, A. E., Culver, J. L., Alferi, S. M., Yount, S. E., McGregor, B. A., Arena, P. L., Harris, S. D., et al. (2001) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.20.1.20 · Cited by 1,011
Sex differences in self-disclosure: A meta-analysis.
Dindia, K., & Allen, M. R. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.106 · Cited by 926
Measures for Clinical Practice: A Sourcebook
Corcoran, K. J., & Fischer, J. (1987) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 900
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Bernhard J, 1998, Psycho‐Oncology, 324
- McNair DM, 1992, Droppleman LF. EDITS Manual: Profile of Mood States
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pain and emotion: a biopsychosocial review of recent research
Lumley, M. A., Cohen, J. L., Borszcz, G. S., Cano, A., Radcliffe, A. M., Porter, L. S., Schubiner, H., & Keefe, F. J. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.20816 · Cited by 836
Self-citationDyadic coping and relationship functioning in couples coping with cancer: A systematic review
Traa, M. J., De Vries, J., Bodenmann, G., & Den Oudsten, B. L. (2015) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjhp.12094 · Cited by 367
Carter, J., Lacchetti, C., Andersen, B. L., Barton, D. L., Bolte, S., Damast, S., Diefenbach, M. A., DuHamel, K. N., Florendo, J., Ganz, P. A., et al. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2017.75.8995 · Cited by 375
Psychological and behavioral approaches to cancer pain management
Syrjala, K. L., Jensen, M. P., Mendoza, M. E., Yi, J. C., Fisher, H. M., & Keefe, F. J. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2013.54.4825 · Cited by 344
Self-citationA systematic review and meta‐analysis of psychosocial interventions for couples coping with cancer
Badr, H., & Krebs, P. M. (2012) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.3200 · Cited by 349
Metadata
- Authors
- Porter, L. S., Keefe, F. J., Baucom, D. H., Hurwitz, H., Moser, B., Patterson, E., & Kim, H. J.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- Duke Medical Center (US)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-09-04
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- S18
- Pages
- 4326-4338
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- PMC
- PMC2762322
- OpenAlex
- W1497307252
- Cited by
- 146
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 9.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Cancer (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (R01CA100743, R01CA100734)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Keywords
- gastrointestinal cancer, couples, emotional disclosure, marital communication, relationship quality, intimacy, psychological distress, patient-partner relationship
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Emotions, Female, Gastrointestinal Neoplasms, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Personal Satisfaction, Psychotherapy, Self Disclosure, Social Support, Spouses
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
