Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 302

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for colorectal liver metastases: A pooled analysis

Chang, Daniel T., Swaminath, Anand, Kozak, Margaret, Weintraub, Julie, Koong, Albert C., Kim, John, Dinniwell, Rob, Brierley, James, Kavanagh, Brian D., Dawson, Laura A., Schefter, Tracey E.·2011·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to determine outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy for colorectal liver metastases in a pooled patient cohort. METHODS: Patients with colorectal liver metastases from 3 institutions were included if they had 1 to 4 lesions, received 1 to 6 fractions of stereotactic body radiotherapy, and had radiologic imaging ≥3 months post‐treatment. Sixty‐five patients with 102 lesions treated from August 2003 to May 2009 were retrospectively analyzed. A tumor control probability (TCP) model was used to estimate the 3‐fraction dose required for >90% local control after converting the schedule into biologically equivalent dose (BED), single‐fraction equivalent dose, or linear quadratic model‐based single‐fraction dose. RESULTS: Forty‐seven (72%) patients had ≥1 chemotherapy regimen before stereotactic body radiotherapy, and 27 (42%) patients had ≥2 regimens. The median follow‐up was 1.2 years (range, 0.3‐5.2 years). The median dose was 42 gray (Gy; range, 22‐60 Gy). When evaluated separately by multivariate analysis, total dose (P = .0015), dose/fraction (P = .003), and BED (P = .004) all correlated with local control by lesion. On multivariate analysis, nonactive extrahepatic disease was associated with overall survival (OS; P = .046), and sustained local control was closely correlated (P = .06). By using single‐fraction equivalent dose, BED, or linear quadratic model‐based single‐fraction dose in the TCP model, the estimated dose range needed for 1‐year local control >90% is 46 to 52 Gy in 3 fractions. CONCLUSIONS: Liver stereotactic body radiotherapy is well tolerated and effective for colorectal liver metastases. The strong correlation between local control and OS supports controlling hepatic disease even for heavily pretreated patients. For a 3‐fraction regimen of stereotactic body radiotherapy, a prescription dose of ≥48 Gy should be considered, if normal tissue constraints allow. Cancer 2011. © 2011 American Cancer Society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.25997

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Cited by

See all 302

Metadata

Authors
Chang, D. T., Swaminath, A., Kozak, M., Weintraub, J., Koong, A. C., Kim, J., Dinniwell, R., Brierley, J., Kavanagh, B. D., Dawson, L. A., & Schefter, T. E.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-03-22
Volume
117
Issue
17
Pages
4060-4069
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W1501842160
Cited by
302
References
37
FWCI
25.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stereotactic body radiotherapy for colorectal liver metastases: A pooled analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.25997
The paper
Chang, D. T., Swaminath, A., Kozak, M., Weintraub, J., Koong, A. C., Kim, J., Dinniwell, R., Brierley, J., Kavanagh, B. D., Dawson, L. A., & Schefter, T. E. (2011). Stereotactic body radiotherapy for colorectal liver metastases: A pooled analysis. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.25997

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.