The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Neurogenesis in colorectal cancer is a marker of aggressive tumor behavior and poor outcomes
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer staging criteria do not rely on examination of neuronal tissue. The authors previously demonstrated that perineural invasion is an independent prognostic factor of outcomes in colorectal cancer. For the current study, they hypothesized that neurogenesis occurs in colorectal cancer and portends an aggressive tumor phenotype. METHODS: In total, samples from 236 patients with colorectal cancer were used to create a tissue array and database. Tissue array slides were immunostained for protein gene product 9.5 (PGP9.5) to identify nerve tissue. The correlation between markers of neurogenesis and oncologic outcomes was determined. The effect of colorectal cancer cells on stimulating neurogenesis in vitro was evaluated using a dorsal root ganglia coculture model. RESULTS: Patients whose tumors exhibited high degrees of neurogenesis had 50% reductions in 5‐year overall survival and disease‐free survival compared with patients whose tumors contained no detectable neurogenesis (P = .002 and P = .006, respectively). Patients with stage II disease and high degrees of neurogenesis had greater reductions in 5‐year overall survival and disease‐free survival compared with lymph node‐negative patients with no neurogenesis (P = .002 and P = .008, respectively). Patients with stage II disease and high degrees of neurogenesis had lower 5‐year overall survival and disease‐free survival compared with patients who had stage III disease with no neurogenesis (P = .01 and P = .008, respectively). Colorectal cancer cells stimulated neurogenesis and exhibited evidence of neuroepithelial interactions between nerves and tumor cells in vitro. CONCLUSIONS: Neurogenesis in colorectal cancer appeared to play a critical role in colorectal cancer progression. Furthermore, the current results indicated that neurogenesis functions as an independent predictor of outcomes and may play a role in therapy stratification for patients with lymph node‐negative disease. Cancer 2011;. © 2011 American Cancer Society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nerve Growth Factor Promotes Gastric Tumorigenesis through Aberrant Cholinergic Signaling
Hayakawa, Y., Sakitani, K., Konishi, M., Asfaha, S., Niikura, R., Tomita, H., Renz, B. W., Tailor, Y., Macchini, M., Middelhoff, M., et al. (2017) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2016.11.005 · Cited by 573
Zahalka, A. H., & Frenette, P. S. (2020) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-019-0237-2 · Cited by 470
Mancusi, R., & Monje, M. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05968-y · Cited by 353
Tumor Neurobiology and the War of Nerves in Cancer
Faulkner, S., Jobling, P., March, B., Jiang, C. C., & Hondermarck, H. (2019) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-18-1398 · Cited by 267
Demir, I. E., Schäfer, K.-H., Tieftrunk, E., Friess, H., & Ceyhan, G. O. (2013) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-013-1099-4 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Albo, D., Akay, C. L., Marshall, C. L., Wilks, J. A., Verstovsek, G., Liu, H., Agarwal, N., Berger, D. H., & Ayala, G. E.
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-04-08
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 4834-4845
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- OpenAlex
- W1521729043
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neurogenesis in colorectal cancer is a marker of aggressive tumor behavior and poor outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.26117
- The paper
- Albo, D., Akay, C. L., Marshall, C. L., Wilks, J. A., Verstovsek, G., Liu, H., Agarwal, N., Berger, D. H., & Ayala, G. E. (2011). Neurogenesis in colorectal cancer is a marker of aggressive tumor behavior and poor outcomes. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.26117
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.