Cited by 175Acute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processesAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research

Phase II, multicenter, randomized trial of CPX‐351 (cytarabine:daunorubicin) liposome injection versus intensive salvage therapy in adults with first relapse AML

Open access
Cortes, Jorge E., Goldberg, Stuart L., Feldman, Eric J., Rizzeri, David A., Hogge, Donna E., Larson, Melissa, Pigneux, Arnaud, Recher, Christian +5 more·2015·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: CPX‐351 is a liposome‐encapsulated fixed‐molar‐ratio formulation of cytarabine and daunorubicin that exploits molar ratio–dependent drug‐drug synergy to enhance antileukemic efficacy. METHODS: This phase II study randomized 125 patients 2:1 to CPX‐351 or investigators' choice of first salvage chemotherapy. Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first relapse after initial Complete Remission (CR) lasting ≥1 month were stratified per the European Prognostic Index (EPI) into favorable, intermediate, and poor‐risk groups based on duration of first CR, cytogenetics, age, and transplant history. Control salvage treatment was usually based on cytarabine and anthracycline, often with 1 or more additional agents. Survival at 1 year was the primary efficacy end point. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were well balanced between the 2 study arms. Improvements in efficacy outcomes were observed following CPX‐351, but did not meet prospectively defined statistical criteria for 1‐year survival improvement in the overall population. Subset analyses of the EPI‐defined poor‐risk strata demonstrated higher response rates (39.3% vs 27.6%) and improvements in event‐free survival (HR, 0.63; P = .08) and overall survival (HR, 0.55; P = .02). Also, 60‐day mortality was lower in the CPX‐351 study arm for poor‐risk patients (16.1% vs 24.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, the data suggest possible improved outcomes in CPX‐351‐treated first relapse AML patients with EPI‐defined poor‐risk disease. Cancer 2015;121:234–42. © 2014 American Cancer Society.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.28974

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • VYEXOS/CPX-351 is a combination therapy that encapsulates a synergistic ratio of two anticancer drugs (cytarabine and daunorubicin).

    “For example, VYEXOS/CPX‐351 is a combination therapy that encapsulates a synergistic ratio of two anticancer drugs (cytarabine and daunorubicin).349”

    From Smart nanoparticles for cancer therapy (2023) · cites this paper as [349]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cortes, J. E., Goldberg, S. L., Feldman, E. J., Rizzeri, D. A., Hogge, D. E., Larson, M., Pigneux, A., Recher, C., Schiller, G., Warzocha, K., Kantarjian, H., Louie, A. C., & Kolitz, J. E.
Affiliations
  • The MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas
  • Hackensack University Medical Center (US)
  • NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • BC Cancer Agency (CA)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
  • Haut‐Lévêque, Bordeaux France
  • Hopital Purpan, Toulouse France
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Instytut Hematologii i Transfuzjologi (PL)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • Celator Pharmaceuticals, Inc Princeton New Jersey
  • Northwell Health (US)
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-09-15
Volume
121
Issue
2
Pages
234-242
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W1568498224
Cited by
175
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 8
FWCI
10.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (CA016672)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Keywords
CPX-351, liposomal cytarabine, daunorubicin, acute myeloid leukemia, first relapse, salvage chemotherapy, poor-risk patients, event-free survival, overall survival, 60-day mortality
MeSH terms
Gemtuzumab, Adult, Aged, Aminoglycosides, Amsacrine, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Cytarabine, Daunorubicin, Etoposide, Female, Humans, Injections, Liposomes, Male, Middle Aged, Mitoxantrone, Recurrence, Remission Induction, Vidarabine, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, Salvage Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Cladribine, Risk Assessment, Disease-Free Survival, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review