Cited by 50Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyCancer survivorship and careWorkplace Spirituality and Leadership

Religion/spirituality and health in the context of cancer: Cross‐domain integration, unresolved issues, and future directions

Open access
Park, Crystal L., Sherman, Allen C., Jim, Heather S. L., Salsman, John M.·2015·Cancer

Abstract

This article summarizes the findings of 3 previous meta‐analytic reviews presented in this issue that evaluate associations between religiousness/spirituality (R/S) and patient‐reported outcomes across mental, physical, and social health domains. The results are synthesized, caveats in interpreting this set of analyses are discussed, directions are provided for future research, and tentative suggestions are made for clinical applications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.29351

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent meta-analyses of 1341 effects drawn from over 44,000 patients with cancer demonstrated an overall positive relationship between RS and self-reported measures of health outcomes, but the strength varied as a function of RS dimension and physical, mental, and social outcomes assessed.

    “Recent meta-analyses of 1341 effects drawn from over 44,000 patients with cancer demonstrated an overall positive relationship between RS and self-reported measures of health outcomes (Park et al., 2015) but the strength of that relationship varied as a function of both the RS dimension and the physical (Jim et al., 2015), mental (Salsman et al., 2015), and social (Sherman et al., 2015) outcomes”
  • The strongest relationships were found between affective dimensions of RS and mental health outcomes, whereas behavioral RS constructs showed few significant associations with health, except for a modest positive relationship with social health outcomes.

    “The strongest relationships were found between affective dimensions of RS (e.g., sense of meaning, purpose, or connection to a source larger than oneself) and mental health outcomes, whereas behavioral RS constructs (e.g., service attendance, prayer and meditation) showed few significant associations with health, except for a modest positive relationship with social health outcomes.”
  • Using the FACIT-Sp as a predictor of well-being outcomes is a common misuse which confounds predictor and outcome variables.

    “care should be taken to avoid using the measure as a predictor of well-being outcomes—a common misuse which confounds predictor and outcome variables (Park et al., 2015).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [30]Feher S Maly RC Coping with breast cancer in later life: the role of religious faith Psycho-Oncology 1999 8 408 416 10559800
  2. [42]Cole B Pargament K Re-creating your life: a spiritual/psychotherapeutic intervention for people diagnosed with cancer Psycho-Oncology 1999 8 395 407 10559799

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Park, C. L., Sherman, A. C., Jim, H. S. L., & Salsman, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Park, Crystal L.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-08-10
Volume
121
Issue
21
Pages
3789-3794
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W2146936985
Cited by
49
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3
FWCI
6.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (K07CA158008)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
Keywords
religiosity, spirituality, patient-reported outcomes, mental health, physical health, social health, cross-domain integration, clinical application
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Cognition, Health Status, Humans, Mental Health, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Religion and Medicine, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Spirituality, Social Skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review