Cited by 17Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyCancer survivorship and careMental Health via Writing

Religious Coping in Cancer: A Quantitative Analysis of Expressive Writing Samples from Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma

Open access
Narayanan, Santhosshi, Milbury, Kathrin, Wagner, Richard, Cohen, Lorenzo·2020·Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

Abstract

Context Past religiosity/spirituality (R/S) research has mainly relied on self-report instruments, which may result in self-presentation and defensive biases.Objectives To address these limitations, we reviewed the writing samples that were generated as part of an expressive writing (EW) trial, coded the samples for R/S content, and examined cross-sectional and prospective associations between R/S content and symptom and psychosocial outcomes.Methods Participants diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma who were randomized to the EW arm completed a standard writing protocol. Before randomization, they completed validated measures of R/S, depressive symptoms, social support, fatigue, and sleep disturbances and one, four, and 10 months after completing the intervention. Writing samples were coded for positive and negative religious coping (RC), and personal (e.g., private prayer) and collective (e.g., church attendance) religious engagement (RE).Results Of the 138 patients, 117 provided at least one writing sample, and 89% of participants made at least one R/S reference with 70% including at least one positive RC statement, and 45.3% revealed personal and 42.3% collective RE. Negative RC was rare (8%). Although positive RC and RE were significantly associated with the R/S Index (P < 0.01), negative RC was not. In prospective analyses, RE was associated with reduced cancer-related symptoms over time (P = 0.04), and negative RC was associated with increased psychological distress over time (P = 0.004).Conclusion Behavioral coding of EW samples supported the literature suggesting that positive RC is common among patients with cancer. Although negative RC may be relatively rare, it may be associated with psychological distress.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.04.029

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Expressive writing has been proven effective in patients with chronic diseases and cancer to reduce and manage psychophysical symptoms.

    “This technique has also been proven effective in patients with chronic diseases and cancer, to reduce and manage psychophysical symptoms [14,15].”

    From Effectiveness of Expressive Writing in Kidney Transplanted Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study (2022) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Results report that renal cell carcinoma patients who wrote more about private religious engagement had lower cancer-related symptoms during follow-up. But the Methods say this analysis included only the expressive-writing arm, so it does not establish that expressive writing itself reduced symptoms compared with neutral writing. The paper also does not establish effectiveness across chronic diseases or for psychophysical symptoms generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [17]Pargament KI, Koenig HG, Tarakeshwar N, Hahn J. Religious coping methods as predictors of psychological, physical and spiritual outcomes among medically ill elderly patients: a two-year longitudinal study. J Health Psychol 2004; 9: 713– 30. 10.1177/1359105304045366 15367751 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [36]Wolfer R, Sang C. Comparing the SAS GLM and MIXED Procedures for Repeated Measures. In: Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual SAS Users Group Conference, Cary, NC., Gary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.,, 1995.
  3. [37]Milbury K, Lopez G, Spelman A, Examination of moderators of expressive writing in patients with renal cell carcinoma: the role of depression and social support. Psychooncology 2016; 26: 1361– 1368. 10.1002/pon.4148 27145447 PMC5094904 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Narayanan, S., Milbury, K., Wagner, R., & Cohen, L.
Affiliations
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Narayanan, Santhosshi
Venue
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-10
Volume
60
Issue
4
Pages
737-745.e3
ISSN
0885-3924 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3022723035
Cited by
17
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
Keywords
religious coping, spirituality, renal cell carcinoma, cancer patients, expressive writing, religious involvement, prayer, church attendance, psychological distress, depressive symptoms, social support, fatigue, sleep disorders, cancer symptoms
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Carcinoma, Renal Cell, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Kidney Neoplasms, Prospective Studies, Writing, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review