Cited by 320Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyCancer survivorship and careWorkplace Spirituality and Leadership

Spirituality and well‐being in cancer patients: a review

Visser, Anja, Garssen, Bert, Vingerhoets, Ad·2010·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

Objective : Cancer places many demands on the patient and threatens the person's sense of meaning to life. It has been shown that cancer patients use their spirituality to cope with these experiences. The present literature review summarizes the research findings on the relationship between spirituality and emotional well‐being. Special attention is given to the strength of the research findings. Methods : A literature search was performed in Pubmed and Web of Science. Spirituality does not necessarily coincide with religiosity. Therefore, studies were excluded that focused on religiosity. Forty publications met the inclusion criteria: Twenty‐seven studies that investigated the relationship between spirituality and well‐being, and 13 publications that explored the relationship between meaning in life and well‐being. Results : The majority of the cross‐sectional studies (31 of 36) found a positive association between spirituality and well‐being. The four studies with a longitudinal design showed mixed results. The significance of the findings is challenged, because most spirituality questionnaires contain several items that directly refer to emotional well‐being. Conclusions : Despite that the majority of the studies concluded that spirituality was associated with higher well‐being, no definitive conclusions on this relationship can be drawn due to major methodological shortcomings of these studies. Longitudinal research utilizing spirituality and well‐being measures that do not overlap in content is recommended. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.1626

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 83 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Visser, A., Garssen, B., & Vingerhoets, A.
Affiliations
  • Helen Dowling Instituut (NL)
  • Tilburg University (NL)
Corresponding author
Visser, Anja
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-11-13
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
565-572
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W2004366506
Cited by
320
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 80 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 20
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
Keywords
spirituality, emotional well-being, cancer patients, meaning in life, coping with cancer, religiosity, methodological limitations
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Mental Health, Neoplasms, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review