The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A study of over 35,000 women with breast cancer tested with a 25‐gene panel of hereditary cancer genes
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: As panel testing becomes more common in clinical practice, it is important to understand the prevalence and trends associated with the pathogenic variants (PVs) identified. This is especially true for genetically heterogeneous cancers, such as breast cancer (BC), in which PVs in different genes may be associated with various risks and cancer subtypes. The authors evaluated the outcomes of genetic testing among women who had a personal history of BC. METHODS: A total of 35,409 women with a single diagnosis of BC who underwent clinical genetic testing with a 25‐gene panel were included in the current analysis. Women with multiple BCs and men with BC were excluded. The frequency and distribution of PVs were assessed for the overall cohort, among women with triple‐negative BC (TNBC) (n = 4797), and by age at diagnosis. RESULTS: PVs were identified in 9.3% of women tested; 51.5% of PVs were identified in genes other than breast cancer 1 (BRCA1) and BRCA2, including checkpoint kinase 2 (CHEK2) (11.7%), ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM; ATM serine/threonine kinase) (9.7%), and partner and localizer of BRCA2 (PALB2) (9.3%). The prevalence of PVs in BRCA1, PALB2, BRCA1‐associated RING domain 1 (BARD1), BRCA1‐interacting protein C‐terminal helicase 1 (BRIP1), and RAD51 paralog C (RAD51C) was statistically higher among women with TNBC. The PV rate was higher among women aged <40 years, lower among women aged >59 years, and relatively constant (8.5%‐9.0%) among women who were diagnosed between ages 40 and 59 years. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that panel testing increased the number of women identified as carrying a PV in this cohort compared with BRCA testing alone. Furthermore, the proportion of women identified who carried a PV in this cohort did not decrease between ages 40 and 59 years. Cancer 2017;123:1721–1730. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Richards, S., Aziz, N., Bale, S., Bick, D., Das, S., Gastier-Foster, J., Grody, W. W., Hegde, M., Lyon, E., Spector, E., et al. (2015) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1038/gim.2015.30 · Cited by 32,594
Antoniou, A., Pharoah, P. D. P., Narod, S., Risch, H. A., Eyfjord, J. E., Hopper, J. L., Loman, N., Olsson, H., Johannsson, O., Borg, Å., et al. (2003) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/375033 · Cited by 3,680
Risks of cancer in BRCA1-mutation carriers
FORD, D. (1994) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(94)91578-4 · Cited by 1,850
A novel HER2-positive breast cancer phenotype arising from germline TP53 mutations: Table 1
Wilson, J. R. F., Bateman, A. C., Hanson, H., An, Q., Evans, G., Rahman, N., Jones, J. L., & Eccles, D. M. (2010) · Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.1136/jmg.2010.078113 · Cited by 122
Cited by
Pathogenesis of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Derakhshan, F., & Reis-Filho, J. S. (2022) · Annual Review of Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease · doi:10.1146/annurev-pathol-042420-093238 · Cited by 714
Hu, C., Hart, S. N., Polley, E. C., Gnanaolivu, R., Shimelis, H., Lee, K. Y., Lilyquist, J., Na, J., Moore, R., Antwi, S. O., et al. (2018) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2018.6228 · Cited by 577
The multi-factorial nature of clinical multidrug resistance in cancer
Assaraf, Y. G., Brozovic, A., Gonçalves, A. C., Jurkovicova, D., Linē, A., Machuqueiro, M., Saponara, S., Sarmento-Ribeiro, A. B., Xavier, C. P. R., & Vasconcelos, M. H. (2019) · Drug Resistance Updates · doi:10.1016/j.drup.2019.100645 · Cited by 528
Underdiagnosis of Hereditary Breast Cancer: Are Genetic Testing Guidelines a Tool or an Obstacle?
Beitsch, P. D., Whitworth, P. W., Hughes, K., Patel, R., Rosen, B., Compagnoni, G., Baron, P., Simmons, R., Smith, L. A., Grady, I., et al. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.18.01631 · Cited by 363
Systemic Therapy for Estrogen Receptor–Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer
Burstein, H. J. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1307118 · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Buys, S. S., Sandbach, J. F., Gammon, A., Patel, G., Kidd, J., Brown, K. L., Sharma, L., Saam, J., Lancaster, J., & Daly, M. B.
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-01-13
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1721-1730
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- OpenAlex
- W2578010562
- Cited by
- 399
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 27.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A study of over 35,000 women with breast cancer tested with a 25‐gene panel of hereditary cancer genes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.30498
- The paper
- Buys, S. S., Sandbach, J. F., Gammon, A., Patel, G., Kidd, J., Brown, K. L., Sharma, L., Saam, J., Lancaster, J., & Daly, M. B. (2017). A study of over 35,000 women with breast cancer tested with a 25‐gene panel of hereditary cancer genes. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30498
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.