Cited by 577Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchGenetic factors in colorectal cancerBRCA gene mutations in cancer

Association Between Inherited Germline Mutations in Cancer Predisposition Genes and Risk of Pancreatic Cancer

Open access
Hu, Chunling, Hart, Steven N., Polley, Eric C., Gnanaolivu, Rohan, Shimelis, Hermela, Lee, Kun Y., Lilyquist, Jenna, Na, Jie +11 more·2018·JAMA

Abstract

Importance: Individuals genetically predisposed to pancreatic cancer may benefit from early detection. Genes that predispose to pancreatic cancer and the risks of pancreatic cancer associated with mutations in these genes are not well defined. Objective: To determine whether inherited germline mutations in cancer predisposition genes are associated with increased risks of pancreatic cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: Case-control analysis to identify pancreatic cancer predisposition genes; longitudinal analysis of patients with pancreatic cancer for prognosis. The study included 3030 adults diagnosed as having pancreatic cancer and enrolled in a Mayo Clinic registry between October 12, 2000, and March 31, 2016, with last follow-up on June 22, 2017. Reference controls were 123 136 individuals with exome sequence data in the public Genome Aggregation Database and 53 105 in the Exome Aggregation Consortium database. Exposures: Individuals were classified based on carrying a deleterious mutation in cancer predisposition genes and having a personal or family history of cancer. Main Outcomes and Measures: Germline mutations in coding regions of 21 cancer predisposition genes were identified by sequencing of products from a custom multiplex polymerase chain reaction-based panel; associations of genes with pancreatic cancer were assessed by comparing frequency of mutations in genes of pancreatic cancer patients with those of reference controls. Results: Comparing 3030 case patients with pancreatic cancer (43.2% female; 95.6% non-Hispanic white; mean age at diagnosis, 65.3 [SD, 10.7] years) with reference controls, significant associations were observed between pancreatic cancer and mutations in CDKN2A (0.3% of cases and 0.02% of controls; odds ratio [OR], 12.33; 95% CI, 5.43-25.61); TP53 (0.2% of cases and 0.02% of controls; OR, 6.70; 95% CI, 2.52-14.95); MLH1 (0.13% of cases and 0.02% of controls; OR, 6.66; 95% CI, 1.94-17.53); BRCA2 (1.9% of cases and 0.3% of controls; OR, 6.20; 95% CI, 4.62-8.17); ATM (2.3% of cases and 0.37% of controls; OR, 5.71; 95% CI, 4.38-7.33); and BRCA1 (0.6% of cases and 0.2% of controls; OR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.54-4.05). Conclusions and Relevance: In this case-control study, mutations in 6 genes associated with pancreatic cancer were found in 5.5% of all pancreatic cancer patients, including 7.9% of patients with a family history of pancreatic cancer and 5.2% of patients without a family history of pancreatic cancer. Further research is needed for replication in other populations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2018.6228

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [20]Cutadept http://journal.embnet.org/index.php/embnetjournal/article/view/200. Accessed May 31, 2018.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hu, C., Hart, S. N., Polley, E. C., Gnanaolivu, R., Shimelis, H., Lee, K. Y., Lilyquist, J., Na, J., Moore, R., Antwi, S. O., Bamlet, W. R., Chaffee, K. G., DiCarlo, J., Wu, Z., Samara, R., Kasi, P. M., McWilliams, R. R., Petersen, G. M., & Couch, F. J.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Qiagen (Germany) (DE)
Corresponding author
Couch, Fergus J.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2018-06-19
Volume
319
Issue
23
Pages
2401
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2809494794
Cited by
577
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 88 · 2021: 96 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 1
FWCI
21.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Rolfe Pancreatic Cancer Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic
  • National Cancer Institute (R25CA092049, R01CA192393, P50CA102701, R01CA097075)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Keywords
pancreatic cancer, germline mutations, cancer susceptibility genes, CDKN2A, TP53, MLH1, BRCA2, PALB2, ATM, PMS2, PMS1, FANCM, FANCL, FANCD2, FANCG, FAN1
MeSH terms
Aged, DNA, Neoplasm, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Registries, Risk, Proportional Hazards Models, Survival Analysis, Case-Control Studies, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Germ-Line Mutation, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal, Databases, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review