Cited by 343Cell Image Analysis TechniquesMedical and Biological SciencesPoint processes and geometric inequalities

On counting and counting errors

Guillery, R.W.·2002·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

Counting objects in histological sections is often a necessary, sometimes an unexpected part of a research project. The recent literature shows that the subject of counting is of particular interest to readers of the Journal of Comparative Neurology but that it is also contentious and difficult. Even a brief review of past issues of the Journal shows that there are many misconceptions about counting and that there remain issues that have received little or no attention. Counts are subject to many errors. Some reports include readily recognizable errors, others fail to include all of the information that is needed for an evaluation of their accuracy. This review is above all a plea for adequate information about the methods used for counts in all publications. It serves to help those who are new to quantitative methods in histology; it considers some of the basic issues arising for anyone undertaking counts, or reviewing manuscripts that include counts. In particular, it considers recently introduced or re-introduced counting methods that depend on accurate measures along the axis perpendicular to the plane of the sections, and looks at the difficulties inherent in these measures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.10221

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guillery, R. W.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Guillery, R.W.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-04-08
Volume
447
Issue
1
Pages
1-7
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W1968759033
Cited by
343
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 19
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Comparative Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ey011494-04)
  • National Eye Institute (EY11494, R01EY012936, EY 12936)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anatomy › Medical and Biological Sciences
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Point processes and geometric inequalities
Keywords
counting errors, quantitative histology, counting methods, measurement accuracy, 3D measurement
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Count, Humans, Microscopy, Microtomy, Neuroanatomy, Research Design, Observer Variation, Selection Bias, Artifacts, Optics and Photonics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review