The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Types of bipolar cells in the mouse retina
Abstract
We studied the morphology of bipolar cells in fixed vertical tissue sections (slices) of the mouse retina by injecting the cells with Lucifer Yellow and Neurobiotin. Nine different cone bipolar cell types and one rod bipolar cell type were distinguished. The major criteria for classifying the cells were the branching pattern and stratification level of their axon terminals in the inner plexiform layer (IPL). To assess this, the IPL was subdivided into five strata of equal width. The slices were immunostained for calretinin, which labels three horizontal bands serving as a standard measure for the precise localization of the axon terminals. Immunostaining the retina with antibodies against the G‐protein Gγ13, a marker for ON‐bipolar cells, made it possible to separate OFF‐ and ON‐bipolar cells. At least two OFF‐cone bipolar cells (Types 1 and 2) were immunolabeled with antibodies against the neurokinin 3 receptors (NK3R). A further OFF‐ and an ON‐cone bipolar cell (Types 3 and 5) were immunostained with antibodies against the calcium‐binding protein CaB5. The bipolar cell types described here were compared with previous schemes of rat and primate bipolar cells. Homologous types between the three species are discussed. J. Comp. Neurol. 469:70–82, 2004. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Takamori, S., Rhee, J. S., Rosenmund, C., & Jahn, R. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35025070 · Cited by 862
Cholinergic amacrine cells in the rat retina
Voigt, T. (1986) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.902480103 · Cited by 284
Johnson, J., Tian, N., Caywood, M. S., Reimer, R. J., Edwards, R. H., & Copenhagen, D. R. (2003) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.23-02-00518.2003 · Cited by 197
Cited by
Parallel processing in the mammalian retina
Wässle, H. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1497 · Cited by 1,252
Self-citationFunctional architecture of the retina: Development and disease
Hoon, M., Okawa, H., Della Santina, L., & Wong, R. O. L. (2014) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2014.06.003 · Cited by 585
The diverse functional roles and regulation of neuronal gap junctions in the retina
Bloomfield, S. A., & Völgyi, B. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2636 · Cited by 428
Cone Contacts, Mosaics, and Territories of Bipolar Cells in the Mouse Retina
Wässle, H., Puller, C., Müller, F., & Haverkamp, S. (2009) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4442-08.2009 · Cited by 428
Self-citationThe most numerous ganglion cell type of the mouse retina is a selective feature detector
Zhang, Y., Kim, I.-J., Sanes, J. R., & Meister, M. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1211547109 · Cited by 313
Metadata
- Authors
- Ghosh, K. K., Bujan, S., Haverkamp, S., Feigenspan, A., & Wässle, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-12-15
- Volume
- 469
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 70-82
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2034262791
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Types of bipolar cells in the mouse retina. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.10985
- The paper
- Ghosh, K. K., Bujan, S., Haverkamp, S., Feigenspan, A., & Wässle, H. (2004). Types of bipolar cells in the mouse retina. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.10985
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.