Cited by 146Neurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 92 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multiple neuropeptides in the Drosophila antennal lobe suggest complex modulatory circuits

Carlsson, Mikael A., Diesner, Max, Schachtner, Joachim, Nässel, Dick R.·2010·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

The fruitfly, Drosophila, is dependent on its olfactory sense in food search and reproduction. Processing of odorant information takes place in the antennal lobes, the primary olfactory center in the insect brain. Besides classical neurotransmitters, earlier studies have indicated the presence of a few neuropeptides in the olfactory system. In the present study we made an extensive analysis of the expression of neuropeptides in the Drosophila antennal lobes by direct profiling using matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization‐time‐of‐flight (MALDI‐TOF) mass spectrometry and immunocytochemistry. Neuropeptides from seven different precursor genes were unambiguously identified and their localization in neurons was subsequently revealed by immunocytochemistry. These were short neuropeptide F, tachykinin related peptide, allatostatin A, myoinhibitory peptide, SIFamide, IPNamide, and myosuppressin. The neuropeptides were expressed in subsets of olfactory sensory cells and different populations of local interneurons and extrinsic (centrifugal) neurons. In some neuron types neuropeptides were colocalized with classical neurotransmitters. Our findings suggest a huge complexity in peptidergic signaling in different circuits of the antennal lobe. J. Comp. Neurol. 518:3359–3380, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.22405

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 92 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–146 of 146

Metadata

Authors
Carlsson, M. A., Diesner, M., Schachtner, J., & Nässel, D. R.
Affiliations
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Carlsson, Mikael A.
  • Nässel, Dick R.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-06-23
Volume
518
Issue
16
Pages
3359-3380
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W1979540477
Cited by
146
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 13
FWCI
5.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Comparative Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
neuropeptides, olfactory system, short neuropeptide F, tachykinin-related peptides, allatostatin A, myoinhibitory peptides, SIFamide, myosuppressin, olfactory sensory neurons, local interneurons, neurotransmitter co-localization, peptidergic signaling, olfactory processing
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Brain, Drosophila melanogaster, Female, Hormone Antagonists, Interneurons, Male, Molecular Sequence Data, Neuropeptides, Olfactory Pathways, Smell, Signal Transduction, Olfactory Receptor Neurons, Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization, Drosophila Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review