Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 511

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Approach‐avoidance analysis of rat diencephalon

Open access
Olds, M. E., Olds, J.·1963·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

Behavioral reinforcement by stimulation of diencephalic structures is by now well established. Delgado, Roberts, and Miller (’54), after the work of Hess (’54), Gastaut et al. ( ’ 5 2 ) , Kaada, (’51), and Masserman (’41, ’42) , established negative reinforcement to diencephalic stimulation in the region of the ventral posterior thalamic nuclei. Work of our own (Olds and Milner, ’54; Olds, ’56, ’60) has established positive reinforcement on stimulation in a system based in medial forebrain bundle regions of the lateral hypothalamus and also in the other brain regions tied together by the widely distributed medial forebrain bundle. Roberts (’58a, b), Brown and Cohen (’59), and Bower and Miller (’58) have indicated some regions where both approach and avoidance are evoked by stimulation of the same point. Brodie et al. (‘60) have shown, to the contrary, that some points yielding positive reinforcement in medial forebrain bundle regions of the macaque could not be made to yield any escape or avoidance reactions at all. Lilly (’58) has reported a focal point near the anterior commissure of the macaque where approach was produced by very low stimulation levels, and a point much lower (near the optic chiasma) where escape was produced by very low stimulation levels. In the rat, we (’60) have found points in medial forebrain bundle regions where stimulation produced positive reinforcement only, points in dorsomedial tegmentum where stimulation produced negative reinforcement only, and points in between these two types, where stimulation produced both positive and negative reinforcement. Questions remain unanswered concerning the pervasiveness of the areas of pure positive reinforcement, of pure negative reinforcement, and of overlap. More specifically, the questions are concerned with which areas are involved in each phenomenon. The present study takes up these questions with respect to diencephalic centers and some bordering regions of midbrain and telencephalon in the rat.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.901200206

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 511

Metadata

Authors
Olds, M. E., & Olds, J.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1963-04
Volume
120
Issue
2
Pages
259-295
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W2084518983
Cited by
511
References
3
FWCI
10.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Approach‐avoidance analysis of rat diencephalon. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.901200206
The paper
Olds, M. E., & Olds, J. (1963). Approach‐avoidance analysis of rat diencephalon. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.901200206

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.