Cited by 442Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMedical and Biological SciencesNeuroscience of respiration and sleep

The isodendritic core of the brain stem

Ramón‐Moliner, E., Nauta, W. J. H.·1966·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

According to their degree of morphological specialization, the cell populations of the brain stem may be classified into three groups: isodendritic, allodendritic and idiodendritic. The isodendritic neurons, or generalized neurons, are the most frequently encountered. If one discards those isodendritic centers that by common definition are sensory or motor, an isodendritic core is left which displays very little histological variation throughout the whole extent of the brain stem. This core corresponds, with certain restrictions, to the regions that are usually regarded as reticular formation. It constitutes a continuum of overlapping dendritic fields that extends from the spinal cord to the diencephalon. In view of the similarities that exist between the histology of the isodendritic core and the relatively disorganized nervous system of the lower vertebrates, it is postulated that it represents a pool of pluripotential neurons which in the course of phylogeny have remained relatively undifferentiated and in charge of processing afferent signals of very heterogeneous origin. By contrast, the allodendritic and idiodendritic centers can be regarded as relatively specialized centers from the point of view of their dendritic morphology, connections and functions. Attention is paid to the fact that the diffuse characteristics of the isodendritic core do not necessarily entail ill‐defined physiological properties.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.901260301

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Classical anatomical studies have suggested that the brainstem reticular circuitry within which the studied regions lie is undifferentiated or diffuse.

    “Classical anatomical studies have suggested that brainstem reticular circuitry within which the studied regions lie is ‘undifferentiated’23 or ‘diffuse’24.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ramón‐Moliner, E., & Nauta, W. J. H.
Affiliations
Université Laval (CA)
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1966-03
Volume
126
Issue
3
Pages
311-335
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W2016204025
Cited by
442
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Comparative Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anatomy › Medical and Biological Sciences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
Keywords
brainstem, reticular formation, dendritic morphology, phylogenetic evolution, lower vertebrates, spinal cord, diencephalon
MeSH terms
Anatomy, Comparative, Animals, Haplorhini, Brain Stem, Dendrites, Diencephalon, Biological Evolution, Fishes, Neurons, Reticular Formation, Sharks, Spinal Cord, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review