The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An autoradiographic study of the time of origin and the pattern of granule cell migration in the dentate gyrus of the rat
Abstract
The dentate gyrus of the rat contains about 600,000 granule cells. These small neurons are generated over a prolonged period from the 14th day of gestation until sime time after the second postnatal week. The majority of the cells pass through their last phase of DNA synthesis in the postnatal period, and during the peak period of cell generation, between the fifth and seventh days after birth, up to 50,000 granule cells are formed each day. Contrary to earlier reports, most of the cells pass through their last mitotic division either within the stratum granulosum itself, or within the hilar region of the developing gyrus. The precursor population of cells in the hilar region must therefore constitute a pool of true neuroblasts. The origin of this pool of cells has not been definitely established but it seems probable that its cells are derived from the neuroepithelium lining the lateral ventricle adjacent to the region from which the hippocampal pyramidal cells are generated. Examination of the final location of granule cells labeled at different stages reveals three distinct morphogenetic gradients in the gyrus. The cells in the dorsal blade tend to be formed earlier than those in the ventral blade; cells in the more caudal (or temporal) portions of the gyrus are generated earlier than those in more rostral (or septal) regions; and in all regions the more superficial neurons in the stratum granulosum are formed earlier than the deeper granule cells. The bearing of some of these findings on the development and organization of the connections of the dentate gyrus is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimation of nuclear population from microtome sections
Abercrombie, M. (1946) · The Anatomical Record · doi:10.1002/ar.1090940210 · Cited by 4,363
Autoradiographic and histological evidence of postnatal hippocampal neurogenesis in rats
Altman, J., & Das, G. D. (1965) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.901240303 · Cited by 3,592
Cited by
Adult neurogenesis produces a large pool of new granule cells in the dentate gyrus
Cameron, H. A., & Mckay, R. D. G. (2001) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.1040 · Cited by 1,585
Gould, E., McEwen, B. S., Tanapat, P., Galea, L. A. M., & Fuchs, E. (1997) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.17-07-02492.1997 · Cited by 1,496
Rat hippocampal neurons in dispersed cell culture.
Banker, G. A., & Cowan, W. M. (1977) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(77)90594-7 · Cited by 1,110
Self-citationTaupin, P. (2007) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2006.08.002 · Cited by 645
Short‐term and long‐term survival of new neurons in the rat dentate gyrus
Dayer, A. G., Ford, A. A., Cleaver, K. M., Yassaee, M., & Cameron, H. A. (2003) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.10675 · Cited by 628
Metadata
- Authors
- Schlessinger, A. R., Cowan, W. M., & Gottlieb, D. I.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1975-01-15
- Volume
- 159
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 149-175
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2077110494
- Cited by
- 731
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An autoradiographic study of the time of origin and the pattern of granule cell migration in the dentate gyrus of the rat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.901590202
- The paper
- Schlessinger, A. R., Cowan, W. M., & Gottlieb, D. I. (1975). An autoradiographic study of the time of origin and the pattern of granule cell migration in the dentate gyrus of the rat. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.901590202
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.