The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interhemispheric neocortical connections of the corpus callosum in the normal mouse: A study based on anterograde and retrograde methods
Abstract
Interhemispheric neocortical connections are widely distributed through the corpus callosum in the mouse. Callosal connections are present in all cytoarchitectonic fields except field 25. The distal extremity representations of SmI, and MsI the representation of the mystacial vibrissae in SmI, and the more peripheral field representation of VI are relatively acallosal. Dense projections lie in the midline or truncal representations of SmI, MsI, SmII, at the vertical meridian representations bordering field 17, and medial to the AI representation. The radial distribution of terminals is bimodal in most cytoarchitectonic fields. It is unimodal in the supracallosal segment of field 29b and fields 49 and 27, trimodal in fields 13 and 35. The cells of origin of callosal fibers appear to have the same topographic pattern of distribution as the callosal terminals, observing the same steep and gradual density gradients. No cells giving rise to callosal axons are identified in the acallosal regions of fields 2 and 17. Further, superficial focal lesions in cortical areas which receive callosal connections give rise only to homotopic contralateral degeneration. Acallosal areas of 17 and 2 give rise to no callosal connections. The cells of origin of callosal connections are located at all laminar levels of the cortex and include pyramidal and polymorphic cells but not the granule cells of layer IV.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Autoradiographic Study of Cell Migration during Histogenesis of Cerebral Cortex in the Mouse
ANGEVINE, J. B., & SIDMAN, R. L. (1961) · Nature · doi:10.1038/192766b0 · Cited by 1,530
Colonnier, M. (1968) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(68)90234-5 · Cited by 946
Caviness, V. S., & Sidman, R. L. (1973) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.901480202 · Cited by 413
Self-citationThe connections of the dorsomedial nuclei
Leonard, C. M. (2008) · Brain Behavior and Evolution · doi:10.1159/000123730 · Cited by 199
Caviness, V. S. (1973) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.901510203 · Cited by 163
Self-citation
Cited by
Anatomy of the Descending Pathways
Kuypers, H. G. J. M. (1981) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.cp010213 · Cited by 640
Winnubst, J., Bas, E., Ferreira, T. A., Wu, Z., Economo, M. N., Edson, P., Arthur, B. J., Bruns, C., Rokicki, K., Schauder, D., et al. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.07.042 · Cited by 538
Size, laminar and columnar distribution of efferent cells in the sensory‐motor cortex of monkeys
Jones, E. G., & Wise, S. P. (1977) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.901750403 · Cited by 508
Development, specification, and diversity of callosal projection neurons
Fame, R. M., MacDonald, J. L., & Macklis, J. D. (2011) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2010.10.002 · Cited by 381
Origins of crossed and uncrossed retinal projections in pigmented and albino mice
Dräger, U. C., & Olsen, J. F. (1980) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.901910306 · Cited by 360
Metadata
- Authors
- Yorke, C. H., & Caviness, V. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1975-11-15
- Volume
- 164
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 233-245
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W4236373412
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 4.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interhemispheric neocortical connections of the corpus callosum in the normal mouse: A study based on anterograde and retrograde methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.901640206
- The paper
- Yorke, C. H., & Caviness, V. S. (1975). Interhemispheric neocortical connections of the corpus callosum in the normal mouse: A study based on anterograde and retrograde methods. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.901640206
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.