The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Spinal termination of functionally identified primary afferent neurons with slowly conducting myelinated fibers
Abstract
Single primary afferent myelinated fibers from cutaneous receptors of cat and monkey were functionally identified by recording from the spinal cord with micropipettes filled with horseradish peroxidase (HRP). Relatively slowly conducting fibers (< 40 m/sec) from high threshold mechanoreceptors (mechanical nociceptors) and two types of low threshold mechanoreceptor (D‐hair and field) were selected for staining. Iontophoresis of the HRP and subsequent histochemical reaction stained the axons recorded from and their collaterals, including terminations, for several millimeters. The termination patterns in the two species proved essentially identical. Ipsilaterally, the mechanical nociceptor fibers terminated principally in the dorsal horn's marginal zone and in the ventral parts of the nucleus proprius (lamina V in the cat). Some of these nociceptors also had terminals in the midline just dorsal to the central canal, contralaterally in the marginal zone, and at the base of the opposite nucleus proprius. In contrast, the D‐hair primary afferent axons terminated in the dorsal part of the nucleus proprius overlapping into the innermost portion of the substantia gelatinosa. The field receptor fibers terminated predominantly in the middle part of the nucleus proprius. These results suggest that there is a highly specialized central projection of primary afferent endings which is related to sensory function and not to fiber diameter. The marginal zone and most dorsal parts of the substantia gelatinosa receive direct projections from cutaneous nociceptors but do not have direct input from cutaneous receptors transmitting activity initiated by innocuous stimulation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Neuronal circuitry for pain processing in the dorsal horn
Todd, A. J. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2947 · Cited by 1,475
Discriminative and affective touch: Sensing and feeling.
McGlone, F., Wessberg, J., & Olausson, H. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.05.001 · Cited by 1,112
Menétrey, D., Gannon, A., Levine, J. D., & Basbaum, A. I. (1989) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.902850203 · Cited by 503
Todd, A. J., Hughes, D. I., Polgár, E., Nagy, G. G., Mackie, M., Ottersen, O. P., & Maxwell, D. J. (2003) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02406.x · Cited by 435
Yasaka, T., Tiong, S. Y. X., Hughes, D. I., Riddell, J. S., & Todd, A. J. (2010) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2010.08.008 · Cited by 313
Metadata
- Authors
- Light, A. R., & Perl, E. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1979-07-15
- Volume
- 186
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 133-150
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2126764967
- Cited by
- 799
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spinal termination of functionally identified primary afferent neurons with slowly conducting myelinated fibers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.901860203
- The paper
- Light, A. R., & Perl, E. R. (1979). Spinal termination of functionally identified primary afferent neurons with slowly conducting myelinated fibers. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.901860203
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.