Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 593

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evidence for the existence of a sexually dimorphic nucleus in the preoptic area of the rat

Gorski, Roger A., Harlan, Richard E., Jacobson, Carol D., Shryne, James E., Southam, Arthur M.·1980·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

The volume of an intensely staining component of the preoptic area of the male rat is markedly larger than that of the female. Moreover, its volume in both sexes is altered by perinatal hormone exposure consistent with the view that this brain region undergoes hormone dependent sexual differentiation. The present study was carried out to determine if this sexually dimorphic area of the brain has a greater cell density than that of the surround, and if a unique population or distribution of cells, either within one sex or between males and females, characterized this region. A single coronal paraffin section (10 m̈m) through the approximate center of this sexually dimorphic area in four adult gonadectomized rats of each sex was evaluated systematically. Each cell was labelled as being inside or outside of the sexually dimorphic area. In addition to cell density per unit area the following parameters were evaluated through a closed circuit video system: cell size, staining intensity, shape, and the presence of processes and of a nucleolus. The presence of a nucleolus was further used to identify neurons within the total population of almost 5000 cells that was evaluated. In both sexes, the sexually dimorphic area was characterized by a significantly increased cell density per unit area compared to that of the surround. On this basis, the term, the Sexually Dimorphic Nucleus of the Preoptic Area (SDN‐POA) is proposed, for this region. Moreover, the SDN‐POA of the male was characterized by increased neuronal density per unit area. The SDN‐POA in the male was also found to contain larger cells and neurons, as determined by direct measurement of their greatest diameter, as well as a greater percentage of cells and neurons rated large on a three‐point scale (small, medium, and large). No consistent differences in frequency distribution by stain intensity, shape, or the presence of cell processes were found to characterize the SDN‐POA or contribute to the sexual dimorphism. It is concluded that the marked sex difference in the volume of the SDN‐POA is due principally to an increase in the male of the total area of higher cell and neuronal density. However, the present results do not eliminate the possibility that more subtle differences in neuronal characteristics may exist in the SDN‐POA.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.901930214

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Cited by

See all 593

Metadata

Authors
Gorski, R. A., Harlan, R. E., Jacobson, C. D., Shryne, J. E., & Southam, A. M.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1980-09-15
Volume
193
Issue
2
Pages
529-539
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W2016988090
Cited by
593
References
26
FWCI
6.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence for the existence of a sexually dimorphic nucleus in the preoptic area of the rat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.901930214
The paper
Gorski, R. A., Harlan, R. E., Jacobson, C. D., Shryne, J. E., & Southam, A. M. (1980). Evidence for the existence of a sexually dimorphic nucleus in the preoptic area of the rat. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.901930214

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.