The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cingulate cortex of the rhesus monkey: II. Cortical afferents
Abstract
Cortical projections to subdivisions of the cingulate cortex in the rhesus monkey were analyzed with horseradish peroxidase and tritiated amino acid tracers. These projections were evaluated in terms of an expanded cytoarchitectural scheme in which areas 24 and 23 were divided into three ventrodorsal parts, i.e., areas 24a–c and 23a–c. Most cortical input to area 25 originated in the frontal lobe in lateral areas 46 and 9 and orbitofrontal areas 11 and 14. Area 25 also received afferents from cingulate areas 24b, 24c, and 23b, from rostral auditory association areas TS2 and TS3, from the subiculum and CA1 sector of the hippocampus, and from the lateral and accessory basal nuclei of the amygdala (LB and AB, respectively). Areas 24a and 24b received afferents from areas 25 and 23b of cingulate cortex, but most were from frontal and temporal cortices. These included the following areas: frontal areas 9, 11, 12, 13, and 46; temporal polar area TG as well as LB and AB; superior temporal sulcus area TPO; agranular insular cortex; posterior parahippocampal cortex including areas TF, TL, and TH and the subiculum. Autoradiographic cases indicated that area 24c received input from the insula, parietal areas PG and PGm, area TG of the temporal pole, and frontal areas 12 and 46, Additionally, caudal area 24 was the recipient of area PG input but not amygdalar afferents. It was also the primary site of areas TF, TL, and TH projections. The following projections were observed both to and within posterior cingulate cortex. Area 29a–c received inputs from area 46 of the frontal lobe and the subiculum and in turn it projected to area 30. Area 30 had afferents from the posterior parietal cortex (area Opt) and temporal area TF. Areas 23a and 23b received inputs mainly from frontal areas 46, 9, 11, and 14, parietal areas Opt and PGm, area TPO of superior temporal cortex, and areas TH, TL, and TF. Anterior cingulate areas 24a and 24b and posterior areas 29d and 30 projected to area 23. Finally, a rostromedial part of visual association area 19 also projected to area 23. The origin and termination of these connections were expressed in a number of different laminar patterns. Most corticocortical connections arose in layer III and to a lesser extent layer V, while others, e.g., those from the cortex of the superior temporal sulcus, had an equal density of cells in both layers III and V. In one instance projections to area 24 arose almost entirely from layer V of areas TH, TL, and TF. Furthermore, although most projections terminated in layers I–III of cingulate cortex, those of the amygdala to rostral area 24 terminated in deep layer I and layer II while area Opt projections to area 23 terminated mainly in layers I, II, and IV. Four classes of cortical connections have been characterized and each may play a role in the sensorimotor functions of cingulate cortex. These include connections with sensory association and multimodal areas, projections to and from premotor area 24c, subicular termination in areas 25, 24, and 29, and intracingulate connections that may transmit sensory input to areas 24 and 23 into area 24c.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“tract tracing studies in the Macaque monkey (Mesulam and Mufson, 1982; Mufson and Mesulam, 1982; Vogt and Pandya, 1987; Carmichael and Price, 1995) demonstrated that VMAs receive ascending projections from viscerosensory cortex (posterior and mid-insula).”
From Allostatic Self-efficacy: A Metacognitive Theory of Dyshomeostasis-Induced Fatigue and Depression (2016) · cites this paper as Vogt and Pandya, 1987
Citations
Cites
Distribution of visual and somatic functions in the parietal associative area 7 of the monkey
Hyvärinen, J., & Shelepin, Y. (1979) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(79)90404-9 · Cited by 142
Research works printed but not linked: 57
- Adey W. R., 1952, An experimental study of hippocampal afferent pathways from prefrontal and cingulate areas in the monkey, J. Anat., 86, 58
- 10.1002/cne.902010204 · DOI
- 10.1002/cne.902300402 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/brain/103.3.525 · DOI
- Barbas E. L., 1981, Frontal lobe afferent input to area 6 in the rhesus monkey, Neurosci. Abs., 7, 414
- 10.1016/0014-4886(78)90240-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/0013-4694(69)90212-0 · DOI
- Von Bonin G., 1947, The Neocortex of Macaca Mulatta
- Bordmann K., 1909, Vergleichende Lokalisationslehre der Grosshirnrinde in ihren Prinzipien dargestellt auf Grund des Zellenbaues
- 10.1016/0006-8993(76)90089-5 · DOI
- Cuénod M., 1965, Unit analysis of visual input to posterior limbic cortex I. Photic stimulation, J. Neurophysiol., 28, 1101, 10.1152/jn.1965.28.6.1101 · DOI
- Ekstein J. M. andD. L.Rosene(1986)Topography of the fornix trajectory and mammillary body termination of efferents from the subiculum the supracallosal subiculum and the hippocampal‐amygdaloid transition area in the rhesus monkey. J. Comp. Neurol. (in press).
- Gabriel M., 1980, Progress in Psychobiology and Physiological Psychology, 125
- 10.1007/978-1-4615-8024-9_1 · DOI
- 10.1002/cne.902350306 · DOI
- Haller R. G., 1976, Avoidance behavior and ileum motility post‐cingulumotomy in monkey, Biol. Psychiatry, 11, 175
- 10.1093/brain/93.4.793 · DOI
- Kaada B. R., 1951, Somato‐motor autonomic and electrocorticographic responses to electrical stimulation of ‘rhinencephalic’ and other structures in primates, cat and dog, Acta Physiol. Scand., 24, 1
- Karnovsky M. J., 1965, Formaldehyde‐glutaraldehyde fixation of high osmolarity for use in electron microscopy, J. Cell Biol., 27, 137A
- Künzle H., 1978, An autoradiographic analysis of the efferent connections from premotor and adjacent prefrontal regions (areas 6 and 9) in Macaca fascicularis, Brain Behav. Evol., 75, 185, 10.1159/000123779 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0140525X00006324 · DOI
- MacLean P. D., 1968, Photically sustained on‐responses of units in posterior hippocampal gyros of awake monkey, J. Neurophysiol., 31, 870, 10.1152/jn.1968.31.6.870 · DOI
- McCleary R. A., 1961, Response specificity in the behavioral effects of limbic system lesions in the cat, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 6, 605, 10.1037/h0044019 · DOI
- 10.1002/cne.902120104 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/cne.902260204 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0042989 · DOI
- 10.1016/0006-8993(79)90928-4 · DOI · Paper page
- Nauta W. J. H., 1964, The Frontal Granular Cortex and Behavior
- 10.1016/0022-3956(71)90017-3 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00234901 · DOI
- Nielson J. M., 1951, Bilateral lesions of the anterior cingulate gyri, Bull. Los Angeles Neurol. Soc., 16, 231
- 10.1016/0006-8993(71)90632-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/0006-8993(69)90141-3 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00523634 · DOI
- 10.1002/cne.902040208 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00237497 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-3956(71)90018-5 · DOI
- 10.1002/cne.902280110 · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.1978.41.4.910 · DOI
- Rolls E. T., 1981, The Amygdaloid Complex. INSERM Symposium No. 20, 383
- 10.1177/26.1.413864 · DOI
- 10.1002/cne.902050103 · DOI
- Sarkissov, 1955, Architectonics of the Human Telencephalic Cortex
- 10.1016/0006-8993(75)90572-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/0006-8993(77)90722-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/0006-8993(78)90584-X · DOI
- 10.1016/0013-4694(73)90149-1 · DOI · Paper page
- Ungerleider L. G., 1982, Advances in the Analysis of Visual Behavior, 549
- 10.1016/0166-2236(83)90167-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.175.4029.1471 · DOI
- 10.1016/0006-8993(81)90348-6 · DOI
- 10.1002/cne.902160207 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.107587 · DOI
- 10.1002/cne.902480106 · DOI
- 10.1212/WNL.23.9.1003 · DOI
- 10.1002/cne.902080302 · DOI
- 10.1016/0006-8993(78)90059-8 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., & Conant, L. L. (2009) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp055 · Cited by 4,060
Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition
Amodio, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (2006) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1884 · Cited by 3,782
“The amygdala has strong inputs to cingulate regions (BAs 24, 25 and 32), but only weak connections with frontopolar regions (BAs 9 and 10”
BackgroundPain Affect Encoded in Human Anterior Cingulate But Not Somatosensory Cortex
Rainville, P., Duncan, G. H., Price, D. D., Carrier, B., & Bushnell, M. C. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5328.968 · Cited by 2,629
Mayberg, H. S., Liotti, M., Brannan, S. K., McGinnis, S., Mahurin, R. K., Jerabek, P. A., Silva, J. A., Tekell, J. L., Martin, C. C., Lancaster, J. L., et al. (1999) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.156.5.675 · Cited by 2,416
The role of the posterior cingulate cortex in cognition and disease
Leech, R., & Sharp, D. J. (2014) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awt162 · Cited by 2,247
Metadata
- Authors
- Vogt, B. A., & Pandya, D. N.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- ORCID
- Vogt, Brent A.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1987-08-08
- Volume
- 262
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 271-289
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2020754901
- Cited by
- 854
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 43
- FWCI
- 4.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Comparative Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS16841, NS18745)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- posterior cingulate cortex, cingulate cortex, cortical afferents, rhesus monkeys, frontal lobe, orbitofrontal cortex, amygdala, hippocampus, subiculum, parahippocampal cortex, insula, superior temporal sulcus, posterior parietal cortex, cytoarchitecture, corticocortical connections
- MeSH terms
- Afferent Pathways, Animals, Cerebral Cortex, Frontal Lobe, Gyrus Cinguli, Macaca, Macaca mulatta, Parietal Lobe, Temporal Lobe
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review