CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 854Memory and Neural MechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cingulate cortex of the rhesus monkey: II. Cortical afferents

Vogt, Brent A., Pandya, Deepak N.·1987·Journal of Comparative Neurology
DOI 10.1002/cne.902620208
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Cortical projections to subdivisions of the cingulate cortex in the rhesus monkey were analyzed with horseradish peroxidase and tritiated amino acid tracers. These projections were evaluated in terms of an expanded cytoarchitectural scheme in which areas 24 and 23 were divided into three ventrodorsal parts, i.e., areas 24a–c and 23a–c. Most cortical input to area 25 originated in the frontal lobe in lateral areas 46 and 9 and orbitofrontal areas 11 and 14. Area 25 also received afferents from cingulate areas 24b, 24c, and 23b, from rostral auditory association areas TS2 and TS3, from the subiculum and CA1 sector of the hippocampus, and from the lateral and accessory basal nuclei of the amygdala (LB and AB, respectively). Areas 24a and 24b received afferents from areas 25 and 23b of cingulate cortex, but most were from frontal and temporal cortices. These included the following areas: frontal areas 9, 11, 12, 13, and 46; temporal polar area TG as well as LB and AB; superior temporal sulcus area TPO; agranular insular cortex; posterior parahippocampal cortex including areas TF, TL, and TH and the subiculum. Autoradiographic cases indicated that area 24c received input from the insula, parietal areas PG and PGm, area TG of the temporal pole, and frontal areas 12 and 46, Additionally, caudal area 24 was the recipient of area PG input but not amygdalar afferents. It was also the primary site of areas TF, TL, and TH projections. The following projections were observed both to and within posterior cingulate cortex. Area 29a–c received inputs from area 46 of the frontal lobe and the subiculum and in turn it projected to area 30. Area 30 had afferents from the posterior parietal cortex (area Opt) and temporal area TF. Areas 23a and 23b received inputs mainly from frontal areas 46, 9, 11, and 14, parietal areas Opt and PGm, area TPO of superior temporal cortex, and areas TH, TL, and TF. Anterior cingulate areas 24a and 24b and posterior areas 29d and 30 projected to area 23. Finally, a rostromedial part of visual association area 19 also projected to area 23. The origin and termination of these connections were expressed in a number of different laminar patterns. Most corticocortical connections arose in layer III and to a lesser extent layer V, while others, e.g., those from the cortex of the superior temporal sulcus, had an equal density of cells in both layers III and V. In one instance projections to area 24 arose almost entirely from layer V of areas TH, TL, and TF. Furthermore, although most projections terminated in layers I–III of cingulate cortex, those of the amygdala to rostral area 24 terminated in deep layer I and layer II while area Opt projections to area 23 terminated mainly in layers I, II, and IV. Four classes of cortical connections have been characterized and each may play a role in the sensorimotor functions of cingulate cortex. These include connections with sensory association and multimodal areas, projections to and from premotor area 24c, subicular termination in areas 25, 24, and 29, and intracingulate connections that may transmit sensory input to areas 24 and 23 into area 24c.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.902620208

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. Adey W. R., 1952, An experimental study of hippocampal afferent pathways from prefrontal and cingulate areas in the monkey, J. Anat., 86, 58
  2. 10.1002/cne.902010204 · DOI
  3. 10.1002/cne.902300402 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1093/brain/103.3.525 · DOI
  5. Barbas E. L., 1981, Frontal lobe afferent input to area 6 in the rhesus monkey, Neurosci. Abs., 7, 414
  6. 10.1016/0014-4886(78)90240-6 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/0013-4694(69)90212-0 · DOI
  8. Von Bonin G., 1947, The Neocortex of Macaca Mulatta
  9. Bordmann K., 1909, Vergleichende Lokalisationslehre der Grosshirnrinde in ihren Prinzipien dargestellt auf Grund des Zellenbaues
  10. 10.1016/0006-8993(76)90089-5 · DOI
  11. Cuénod M., 1965, Unit analysis of visual input to posterior limbic cortex I. Photic stimulation, J. Neurophysiol., 28, 1101, 10.1152/jn.1965.28.6.1101 · DOI
  12. Ekstein J. M. andD. L.Rosene(1986)Topography of the fornix trajectory and mammillary body termination of efferents from the subiculum the supracallosal subiculum and the hippocampal‐amygdaloid transition area in the rhesus monkey. J. Comp. Neurol. (in press).
  13. Gabriel M., 1980, Progress in Psychobiology and Physiological Psychology, 125
  14. 10.1007/978-1-4615-8024-9_1 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/cne.902350306 · DOI
  16. Haller R. G., 1976, Avoidance behavior and ileum motility post‐cingulumotomy in monkey, Biol. Psychiatry, 11, 175
  17. 10.1093/brain/93.4.793 · DOI
  18. Kaada B. R., 1951, Somato‐motor autonomic and electrocorticographic responses to electrical stimulation of ‘rhinencephalic’ and other structures in primates, cat and dog, Acta Physiol. Scand., 24, 1
  19. Karnovsky M. J., 1965, Formaldehyde‐glutaraldehyde fixation of high osmolarity for use in electron microscopy, J. Cell Biol., 27, 137A
  20. Künzle H., 1978, An autoradiographic analysis of the efferent connections from premotor and adjacent prefrontal regions (areas 6 and 9) in Macaca fascicularis, Brain Behav. Evol., 75, 185, 10.1159/000123779 · DOI
  21. 10.1017/S0140525X00006324 · DOI
  22. MacLean P. D., 1968, Photically sustained on‐responses of units in posterior hippocampal gyros of awake monkey, J. Neurophysiol., 31, 870, 10.1152/jn.1968.31.6.870 · DOI
  23. McCleary R. A., 1961, Response specificity in the behavioral effects of limbic system lesions in the cat, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 6, 605, 10.1037/h0044019 · DOI
  24. 10.1002/cne.902120104 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1002/cne.902260204 · DOI
  26. 10.1037/h0042989 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/0006-8993(79)90928-4 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Nauta W. J. H., 1964, The Frontal Granular Cortex and Behavior
  29. 10.1016/0022-3956(71)90017-3 · DOI
  30. 10.1007/BF00234901 · DOI
  31. Nielson J. M., 1951, Bilateral lesions of the anterior cingulate gyri, Bull. Los Angeles Neurol. Soc., 16, 231
  32. 10.1016/0006-8993(71)90632-9 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/0006-8993(69)90141-3 · DOI
  34. 10.1007/BF00523634 · DOI
  35. 10.1002/cne.902040208 · DOI
  36. 10.1007/BF00237497 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/0022-3956(71)90018-5 · DOI
  38. 10.1002/cne.902280110 · DOI
  39. 10.1152/jn.1978.41.4.910 · DOI
  40. Rolls E. T., 1981, The Amygdaloid Complex. INSERM Symposium No. 20, 383
  41. 10.1177/26.1.413864 · DOI
  42. 10.1002/cne.902050103 · DOI
  43. Sarkissov, 1955, Architectonics of the Human Telencephalic Cortex
  44. 10.1016/0006-8993(75)90572-7 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/0006-8993(77)90722-3 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/0006-8993(78)90584-X · DOI
  47. 10.1016/0013-4694(73)90149-1 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Ungerleider L. G., 1982, Advances in the Analysis of Visual Behavior, 549
  49. 10.1016/0166-2236(83)90167-4 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1126/science.175.4029.1471 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/0006-8993(81)90348-6 · DOI
  52. 10.1002/cne.902160207 · DOI
  53. 10.1126/science.107587 · DOI
  54. 10.1002/cne.902480106 · DOI
  55. 10.1212/WNL.23.9.1003 · DOI
  56. 10.1002/cne.902080302 · DOI
  57. 10.1016/0006-8993(78)90059-8 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Vogt, B. A., & Pandya, D. N.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
ORCID
Vogt, Brent A.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1987-08-08
Volume
262
Issue
2
Pages
271-289
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
DOI
10.1002/cne.902620208
OpenAlex
W2020754901
Cited by
854
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 43
FWCI
4.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 6272 d)
Locations
  • The Journal of Comparative Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS16841, NS18745)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
posterior cingulate cortex, cingulate cortex, cortical afferents, rhesus monkeys, frontal lobe, orbitofrontal cortex, amygdala, hippocampus, subiculum, parahippocampal cortex, insula, superior temporal sulcus, posterior parietal cortex, cytoarchitecture, corticocortical connections
MeSH terms
Afferent Pathways, Animals, Cerebral Cortex, Frontal Lobe, Gyrus Cinguli, Macaca, Macaca mulatta, Parietal Lobe, Temporal Lobe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review