CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 385

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Anatomic organization of basoventral and mediodorsal visual recipient prefrontal regions in the rhesus monkey

Barbas, H.·1988·Journal of Comparative Neurology
DOI 10.1002/cne.902760302
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The sources of ipsilateral cortical afferent projections to basoventral and mediodorsal prefrontal cortices that receive some visual input were studied with retrograde tracers (horseradish peroxidase or fluorescent dyes) in eight rhesus monkeys. The basoventral regions injected with tracers included basal (orbital) areas 11 and 12, lateral area 12, and ventral area 46. The mediodorsal regions included portions of medial area 32 and the caudal part of dorsal area 8. These sites represent areas within basoventral and mediodorsal prefrontal cortices that show a gradual increase in architectonic differentiation in a direction from the least differentiated orbital and medial limbic cortices toward the most differentiated cortices in the arcuate concavity. The results showed that the visual input to basoventral and mediodorsal prefrontal cortices originated largely in topographically distinct visual areas. Thus, basoventral sites received most of their visual cortical projections from the inferior temporal cortex. The rostral inferior temporal region was the predominant source of visual projections to orbital prefrontal sites, whereas lateral area 12 and ventral area 46 also received projections which were found more caudally. In contrast, mediodorsal prefrontal sites received most of their visual projections from dorsolateral and dorsomedial visual areas. The cells of origin were located in rostromedial visual cortices after injection of retrograde tracers in area 32 and in more caudal medial and dorsolateral visual areas after injection in caudal area 8. The latter also received substantial projections from visuomotor regions in the caudal portion of the lateral bank of the intraparietal sulcus. These results suggest that the basoventral prefrontal cortices are connected with ventral visual areas implicated in pattern recognition and discrimination, whereas the mediodorsal cortices are connected with medial and dorsolateral occipital and parietal areas associated with visuospatial functions. In addition, the prefrontal areas studied received projections from auditory and/or somatosensory cortices, from areas associated with more than one modality, and from limbic regions. Orbital area 12 seemed to be a major target of projections from somatosensory cortices and the rostral portion of medial area 32 received substantial projections from auditory cortices. The least architectonically differentiated areas (orbital area 11 and medial area 32) had more widespread corticocortical connections, including strong links with limbic cortices. In contrast, areas which showed the highest degree of architectonic differentiation within the basoventral (area 46) and the mediodorsal (area 8) prefrontal cortices had restricted corticocortical connections.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.902760302

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 125

  1. 10.1152/jn.1984.51.1.16 · DOI
  2. 10.1002/cne.902320403 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/0166-4328(86)90225-1 · DOI
  4. Baizer J. S., 1982, Receptive field properties of V3 neurons in monkey, Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., 23, 87
  5. 10.1002/cne.902520310 · DOI
  6. 10.1002/cne.902000309 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/0306-4522(85)90064-8 · DOI
  8. Barbas H., 1982, Cytoarchitecture and intrinsic connections of the prefrontal cortex of the rhesus monkey, Neurosci. Abstr., 8, 933
  9. Barbas H., 1983, Distribution of acetylcholinesterase in the medial and ventral prefrontal cortex of the rhesus monkey, Neurosci. Abstr., 9, 877
  10. 10.1002/cne.902560203 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.07-02-00330.1987 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/0014-4886(77)90112-1 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/0013-4694(69)90212-0 · DOI
  14. Brodmann K., 1905, Beitrage zur histologischen Lokalisation der Grosshirnrinde. III. Mitteilung: Die Rindenfelder der niederen Affen, J. Psychol. Neurol. (Leipz.), 4, 177
  15. 10.1152/jn.1981.46.2.369 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/0042-6989(86)90071-4 · DOI
  17. Butters N., 1969, Retention of delayed‐alternation: Effect of selective lesions of sulcus principalis, Science, 169, 1271, 10.1126/science.165.3899.1271 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/0006-8993(76)90089-5 · DOI
  19. 10.1002/cne.902690307 · DOI
  20. Covey E., 1982, A new visual area in the parieto‐occipital sulcus of the macaque, Neurosci. Abstr., 8, 681
  21. 10.1016/0006-8993(79)90699-1 · DOI
  22. 10.1152/jn.1987.57.3.835 · DOI
  23. 10.1002/cne.902480203 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/317058a0 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/0006-8993(77)90474-7 · DOI
  26. 10.1152/jn.1987.57.4.889 · DOI
  27. Fuster J. M., 1980, The Prefrontal Cortex
  28. 10.1126/science.7233192 · DOI
  29. Gaffan E. A., 1986, Visual identification following inferotemporal ablation in the monkey, Q. J. Exp. Psychol., 38, 5
  30. Gaffan E. A., 1986, Single and concurrent discrimination learning by monkeys after lesion by inferotemporal cortex, Q. J. Exp. Psychol., 38, 31
  31. 10.1002/cne.902210206 · DOI
  32. 10.1080/01616412.1979.11739553 · DOI
  33. 10.1002/cne.902010405 · DOI
  34. 10.1007/BF00325634 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/0042-6989(85)90072-0 · DOI
  36. 10.1152/jn.1981.46.4.773 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/0014-4886(70)90222-0 · DOI
  38. Gower E. C.(1981)Architectonic and Thalamic Connections of Macaque Temporal Polar Cortex. Doctoral dissertation Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge.
  39. 10.1126/science.166.3910.1303 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/0166-4328(87)90240-3 · DOI
  41. 10.1002/cne.902650304 · DOI
  42. 10.1152/physrev.1982.62.3.1060 · DOI
  43. Jacobsen C. F., 1936, Studies of cerebral function in primates: 1. The functions of the frontal association are in monkeys, Comp. Psychol. Monogr., 13, 3
  44. 10.1016/0006-8993(77)90417-6 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/0014-4886(68)90030-7 · DOI
  46. 10.1002/cne.901680203 · DOI
  47. 10.1093/brain/93.4.793 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/0014-4886(65)90016-6 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/0006-8993(78)90216-0 · DOI
  50. Latto R., 1972, Frontal eye‐field lesions in monkeys, Bibl. Ophthalmol., 82, 159
  51. Latto R., 1973, Visual search in monkeys: The effects of frontal eye‐field, inferior parietal and superior collicular lesions, Brain Res., 49, 507, 10.1016/0006-8993(73)90474-5 · DOI
  52. LaVail J. H., 1975, The Use of Axonal Transport for Studies of Neuronal Connectivity, 217
  53. 10.1016/0304-3940(80)90313-4 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/0042-6989(80)90115-7 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.04-01-00309.1984 · DOI
  56. Lobeck L. J., 1983, Neurons in attention‐related regions of the cerebral cortex which project to intermediate and deep layers of superior colliculus of the rhesus monkey, Neurosci. Abstr., 9, 751
  57. 10.1017/S0140525X00006324 · DOI
  58. 10.1002/cne.902350207 · DOI
  59. 10.1146/annurev.ne.10.030187.002051 · DOI
  60. 10.1016/0006-8993(83)90345-1 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/0042-6989(84)90140-8 · DOI
  62. Mesulam M.‐M., 1982, Tracing Neural Connections With Horseradish Peroxidase, 1
  63. 10.1177/28.11.6159394 · DOI
  64. 10.1002/cne.902120102 · DOI
  65. 10.1016/0006-8993(84)90087-8 · DOI
  66. 10.1016/0006-8993(77)90066-X · DOI
  67. Mikami A., 1982, Modifications of neuron activities of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during extrafoveal attention, Behav. Brain Res., 5, 219, 10.1016/0166-4328(82)90056-0 · DOI
  68. 10.1016/0028-3932(78)90062-3 · DOI
  69. 10.1016/0166-4328(82)90080-8 · DOI
  70. 10.1016/0006-8993(78)90571-1 · DOI
  71. 10.1016/0006-8993(73)90543-X · DOI
  72. Motter B. C., 1981, The functional properties of the light sensitive neurons of the posterior parietal cortex studied in waking monkeys: Foveal sparing and opponent vector organization, J. Neurosci., 1, 3, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.01-01-00003.1981 · DOI
  73. Nauta W. J. H., 1964, The Frontal Granular Cortex and Behavior, 397
  74. Nauta W. J. H., 1972, Neural associations of the frontal cortex, Acta Neurobiol. Exp. (Warsz.), 32, 125
  75. 10.1002/cne.902520202 · DOI
  76. 10.1002/cne.902040208 · DOI
  77. Pandya D. N., 1988, Comparative Primate Biology. Vol. 4, Neurosciences, 39
  78. 10.1007/BF00237497 · DOI
  79. 10.1007/978-1-4757-9619-3_1 · DOI
  80. 10.1016/0006-8993(75)90529-6 · DOI
  81. 10.1016/0028-3932(78)90080-5 · DOI
  82. 10.1002/cne.902280110 · DOI
  83. 10.1016/0306-4522(79)90099-X · DOI
  84. Pribram K. H., 1950, Some connections of the orbito‐frontotemporal limbic and hippocampal areas of Macaca mulatta, J. Neurophysiol., 13, 127, 10.1152/jn.1950.13.2.127 · DOI
  85. 10.1016/0166-4328(81)90053-X · DOI
  86. Roberts T. S., 1963, Insular and opercular cortex and its thalamic projection in Macaca mulatta, Arch. Neurol. Neurochir. Psychiatr., 92, 1
  87. Rosene D. L., 1983, Architectonics and connections of the posterior parahippocampal gyrus in the rhesus monkey, Neurosci. Abstr., 9, 222
  88. 10.1177/34.10.3745909 · DOI
  89. 10.1126/science.410102 · DOI
  90. 10.1016/S0163-1047(79)90404-7 · DOI
  91. Sanides F., 1970, The Primate Brain, 137
  92. Sanides F., 1967, Cytoarchitectonic subdivisions of sensorimotor and prefrontal regions and of bordering insular and limbic fields in slow loris (Nycticebus coucang coucang), J. Hirnforsch., 9, 225
  93. 10.1126/science.115091 · DOI
  94. 10.1002/cne.902260309 · DOI
  95. 10.1016/0006-8993(78)90584-X · DOI
  96. 10.1016/0006-8993(80)90888-4 · DOI
  97. 10.1007/BF00236024 · DOI
  98. 10.1038/315322a0 · DOI
  99. 10.1016/0028-3932(73)90006-7 · DOI
  100. 10.1016/0166-2236(82)90237-5 · DOI
  101. 10.1016/0165-0173(79)90010-9 · DOI
  102. 10.1016/0042-6989(85)90071-9 · DOI
  103. 10.1002/cne.902480204 · DOI
  104. Ungerleider L. G., 1982, Analysis of Visual Behavior, 549
  105. 10.1152/jn.1986.56.4.934 · DOI
  106. 10.1146/annurev.ne.02.030179.001303 · DOI
  107. Van Essen D. C., 1985, Cerebral Cortex, 259
  108. 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012269 · DOI
  109. 10.1016/0006-8993(80)90982-8 · DOI
  110. 10.1002/cne.902620207 · DOI · Paper page
  111. Vogt C., 1919, Allgemeinere Ergebnisse unserer Hirnforschung, J. Psychol. Neurol., 25, 279
  112. Von Bonin G., 1947, The Neocortex of Macaca Mulatta
  113. Voytko M. L., 1985, Cooling orbital frontal cortex disrupts matching‐to‐sample and visual discrimination learning in monkeys, Physiol. Psychol., 13, 291, 10.3758/BF03326525 · DOI
  114. 10.1016/0166-4328(86)90078-1 · DOI
  115. 10.1002/cne.900730106 · DOI
  116. 10.1002/cne.902560112 · DOI
  117. Woolsey C. N., 1981, Multiple Somatic Areas
  118. 10.1152/jn.1976.39.4.766 · DOI
  119. 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010452 · DOI
  120. 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012272 · DOI
  121. 10.1038/274423a0 · DOI
  122. 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012270 · DOI · Paper page
  123. 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012271 · DOI
  124. 10.1098/rspb.1980.0038 · DOI
  125. Zeki S. M., 1976, Combined anatomical and electrophysiological studies on the boundary between the second and third visual areas of rhesus monkey cortex, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. [Biol.], 194, 555

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 385

Metadata

Authors
Barbas, H.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1988-10-15
Volume
276
Issue
3
Pages
313-342
ISSN
  • 0021-9967
  • 1096-9861
DOI
10.1002/cne.902760302
Cited by
385
References
1
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 5838 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review