Cited by 230Connexins and lens biologyNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchBarrier Structure and Function Studies

On the organization of astrocytic gap junctions in rat brain as suggested by LM and EM immunohistochemistry of connexin43 expression

Yamamoto, T., Ochalski, A., Hertzberg, E. L., Nagy, J. I.·1990·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

Gap junctions and the intercellular communication syncytium they form between glial cells are thought to play a critical role in glial maintenance of appropriate metabolic environments in neural tissues. We have previously suggested (Yamamoto et al., Brain Res. 508:313–319, '90) that the vast majority of astrocytes in rat brain express connexin43, one of several recently identified gap junction proteins. Here, we confirm ultrastructurally that astrocytes in a number of brain regions of rat are immunolabelled with an antibody against connexin43 and that neurons and oligodendrocytes are devoid of labelling. The distribution of connexin43 immunoreactivity throughout the brain is presented at the light microscope (LM) level. By LM, immunoreactive structures consisted primarily of round or elongated puncta ranging from 0.3 μm to 4 μm in length and of annular profiles ranging from 1 to 10 μm in diameter. Immunolabelled fibrous processes were only occasionally seen and no labelling was observed in astrocytic cell bodies. Long, linear arrays of puncta were rare in gray matter but were common in white matter where they were arranged parallel to myelinated fibers. Puncta organized in a honeycomb pattern were seen near the cerebral cortical surface and frequently around blood vessels. Regional immunoreaction density, which was a reflection of either the concentration or staining intensity of immunoreactive elements, was remarkably heterogeneous; dramatic differences in labelling intensity frequently delineated anatomical boundaries between adjacent nuclei. Abrupt as well as graded fluctuations of immunoreaction intensity were also observed within nuclear structures. By electron microscopy (EM), gap junctions of fibrous and protoplasmic astrocytes were intensely stained and labelled organelles were often observed intracellularly in areas near gap junctions. These junctions and the spread of immunoreaction product to perijunctional organelles in their vicinity were considered to correspond to puncta seen by LM. Labelling within astrocytic cell bodies was seen in only a few instances. In some brain areas, astrocytic processes commonly gave rise to immunoreactive lamellae that partially ensheathed neuronal cell bodies, axon terminals, dendrites, and synaptic glomeruli. Such lamellae were considered to correspond to immunoreactive annular profiles seen by LM. Perivascular endfoot processes of astrocytes displayed intense staining of their gap junctions and portions of their apposing membranes. To the extent that regional differences and ultrastructural localization of connexin43 immunoreactivity reveal global distributions of astrocytic gap junctions composed of connexin43, we suggest (1) that the absence of widespread cytoplasmic labelling within astrocytes may be indicative of local connexin43 synthesis near gap junctions, (2) that small scale heterogeneities within nuclei may reflect relationships between the organizational patterns of glial gap junctions and neural systems, and (3) that enormous variations in demands for gap junctional coupling within astrocytic “functional syncytia” of different brain regions may lead to the establishment of largely separate syncytial compartments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.903020414

Cites

110 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yamamoto, T., Ochalski, A., Hertzberg, E. L., & Nagy, J. I.
Affiliations
  • University of Manitoba (CA)
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Nagy, J. I.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1990-12-22
Volume
302
Issue
4
Pages
853-883
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W2116763991
Cited by
230
References
110
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Comparative Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01gm030667-14)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM 30667)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD00713)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Connexins and lens biology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
Keywords
astrocytes, connexin 43, gap junctions, astrocyte ultrastructure, immunoreactivity distribution, white matter, gray matter, astrocyte-neuron communication, cerebral cortex, rat brain
MeSH terms
Animals, Astrocytes, Brain Chemistry, Immunoenzyme Techniques, Intercellular Junctions, Male, Membrane Proteins, Microscopy, Electron, Myocardium, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Organ Specificity, Rats, Inbred Strains, Connexins, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review