The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Somatic sensory responses in the rostral sector of the posterior group (POm) and in the ventral posterior medial nucleus (VPM) of the rat thalamus
Abstract
The rodent barrel field cortex integrates somatosensory information from two separate thalamic nuclei, the ventral posterior medial nucleus (VPM) and the rostral sector of the posterior complex (POm). This paper compares the sensory responses of POm and VPM cells in urethane‐anesthetized rats as a first step in determining how cortex integrates multiple sensory pathways. A complete representation of the contralateral body surface was identified in POm. Trigeminal receptive fields (RFs) of POm and VPM cells were mapped by computer‐controlled displacement of individual whiskers; responses were quantified by using peristimulus time histograms. Average RF size was similar in POm (5.1 whiskers) and VPM (4.4 whiskers), but evoked responses in the two nuclei differed significantly according to all other measures. VPM cells were maximally responsive to one single whisker‐the „center RF.”︁ Stimulating this whisker evoked, on average, a response of 1.4 spikes/stimulus at a latency of 7 ms; surrounding whiskers evoked responses of < 1 spike/stimulus at latencies of > 8 ms. In contrast, POm cells were nearly equally responsive to several whiskers. Quantitative criteria allowed us to designate a single whisker as the „center RF”︁ and stimulating this whisker evoked, on average, a response of 0.5 spikes/stimulus at a latency of 19 ms. VPM cells, but not POm cells, were able to „follow”︁ repeated whisker deflection at > 5 Hz. We conclude that, when a single whisker is deflected, VPM activates the related cortical barrel‐column at short latency— before the onset of activity in POm. The timing of activation could allow POm cells to modulate the spread of activity between cortical columns.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ledoux, J. E., Ruggiero, D. A., Forest, R., Stornetta, R., & Reis, D. J. (1987) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.902640110 · Cited by 373
Cited by
Thalamus plays a central role in ongoing cortical functioning
Sherman, S. M. (2016) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4269 · Cited by 809
Chung, S., Li, X., & Nelson, S. B. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00659-1 · Cited by 530
Active sensation: Insights from the rodent vibrissa sensorimotor system
Kleinfeld, D., Ahissar, E., & Diamond, M. E. (2006) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2006.06.009 · Cited by 374
Self-citationLong‐range connectivity of mouse primary somatosensory barrel cortex
Aronoff, R., Matyas, F., Mateo, C., Ciron, C., Schneider, B., & Petersen, C. C. H. (2010) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07264.x · Cited by 323
Circuit analysis of experience-dependent plasticity in the developing rat barrel cortex
Shepherd, G. M. G., Pologruto, T. A., & Svoboda, K. (2003) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00152-1 · Cited by 322
Metadata
- Authors
- Diamond, M. E., Armstrong‐James, M., & Ebner, F. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-04-22
- Volume
- 318
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 462-476
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2041180516
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Somatic sensory responses in the rostral sector of the posterior group (POm) and in the ventral posterior medial nucleus (VPM) of the rat thalamus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.903180410
- The paper
- Diamond, M. E., Armstrong‐James, M., & Ebner, F. F. (1992). Somatic sensory responses in the rostral sector of the posterior group (POm) and in the ventral posterior medial nucleus (VPM) of the rat thalamus. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.903180410
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.