Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 318

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Somatic sensory responses in the rostral sector of the posterior group (POm) and in the ventral posterior medial nucleus (VPM) of the rat thalamus

Diamond, Mathew E., Armstrong‐James, Michael, Ebner, Ford F.·1992·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

The rodent barrel field cortex integrates somatosensory information from two separate thalamic nuclei, the ventral posterior medial nucleus (VPM) and the rostral sector of the posterior complex (POm). This paper compares the sensory responses of POm and VPM cells in urethane‐anesthetized rats as a first step in determining how cortex integrates multiple sensory pathways. A complete representation of the contralateral body surface was identified in POm. Trigeminal receptive fields (RFs) of POm and VPM cells were mapped by computer‐controlled displacement of individual whiskers; responses were quantified by using peristimulus time histograms. Average RF size was similar in POm (5.1 whiskers) and VPM (4.4 whiskers), but evoked responses in the two nuclei differed significantly according to all other measures. VPM cells were maximally responsive to one single whisker‐the „center RF.”︁ Stimulating this whisker evoked, on average, a response of 1.4 spikes/stimulus at a latency of 7 ms; surrounding whiskers evoked responses of < 1 spike/stimulus at latencies of > 8 ms. In contrast, POm cells were nearly equally responsive to several whiskers. Quantitative criteria allowed us to designate a single whisker as the „center RF”︁ and stimulating this whisker evoked, on average, a response of 0.5 spikes/stimulus at a latency of 19 ms. VPM cells, but not POm cells, were able to „follow”︁ repeated whisker deflection at > 5 Hz. We conclude that, when a single whisker is deflected, VPM activates the related cortical barrel‐column at short latency— before the onset of activity in POm. The timing of activation could allow POm cells to modulate the spread of activity between cortical columns.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.903180410

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 318

Metadata

Authors
Diamond, M. E., Armstrong‐James, M., & Ebner, F. F.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-04-22
Volume
318
Issue
4
Pages
462-476
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W2041180516
Cited by
318
References
1
FWCI
4.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Somatic sensory responses in the rostral sector of the posterior group (POm) and in the ventral posterior medial nucleus (VPM) of the rat thalamus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.903180410
The paper
Diamond, M. E., Armstrong‐James, M., & Ebner, F. F. (1992). Somatic sensory responses in the rostral sector of the posterior group (POm) and in the ventral posterior medial nucleus (VPM) of the rat thalamus. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.903180410

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.