Cited by 374Tactile and Sensory InteractionsMultisensory perception and integrationMotor Control and Adaptation

Active sensation: Insights from the rodent vibrissa sensorimotor system

Kleinfeld, David, Ahissar, Ehud, Diamond, Mathew E·2006·Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Abstract

Rats sweep their vibrissae through space to locate objects in their immediate environment. In essence, their view of the proximal world is generated through pliable hairs that tap and palpate objects. The texture and shape of those objects must be discerned for the rat to assess the value of the object. Furthermore, the location of those objects must be specified with reference to the position of the rat's head for the rat to plan its movements. Recent in vivo and in vitro electrophysiological measurements provide insight into the algorithms and mechanisms that underlie these behavioral-based computations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conb.2006.06.009

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Serial transformation of sensory inputs along bottom-up hierarchical pathways has been observed in rodents engaged in whisker-discrimination tasks, with increasingly stronger association with perceptual choice in S2 and premotor areas rather than wS1.

    “Serial transformation of sensory inputs along bottom–up hierarchical pathways has been observed in rodents engaged in whisker-discrimination tasks (8, 9) with an increasingly stronger association with perceptual choice in S2 (10, 11) and premotor areas (12–14) rather than whisker-related wS1 (9).”
  • Whisking during CL straight run is executed at 15 ± 2 Hz with an amplitude of 39 ± 5° around a set point of 58 ± 5°, typical for foveal whisking during fast locomotion.

    “Whisking during CL straight run (t < 0) is executed at 15 ± 2 Hz (mean ± SD) with an amplitude of just 39 ± 5° (mean ± SD) around a set point of 58 ± 5° (mean ± SD), typical for “foveal” whisking during fast locomotion (8, 28).”
  • Most information about whisker contact with objects is relayed through the lemniscal pathway.

    “Most information about whisker contact with objects is relayed through lemniscal pathway (8, 15, 43) (Fig. 5A).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kleinfeld, D., Ahissar, E., & Diamond, M. E.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
  • Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati (IT)
Corresponding author
Kleinfeld, David
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-08
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
435-444
ISSN
0959-4388 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2141004549
Cited by
374
References
120
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 14
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SDL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Minerva Foundation
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
  • Israel Science Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
active sensing, object localization, texture discrimination, object shape discrimination, motor planning
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Afferent Pathways, Animals, Brain, Mechanoreceptors, Neurons, Afferent, Orientation, Rodentia, Space Perception, Touch, Vibrissae, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review