The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of unilateral partial cochlear lesions in adult cats on the representation of lesioned and unlesioned cochleas in primary auditory cortex
Abstract
We examined the effect of unilateral restricted cochlear lesions in adult cats on the topographic representations (“maps”) of the lesioned and unlesioned cochleas in the primary auditory cortex (AI) contralateral to the lesioned cochlea. Frequency (tonotopic) maps were derived by conventional multineuron mapping procedures in anesthetized animals. In confirmation of a study in adult guinea pigs (Robertson and Irvine [1989] J. Comp. Neurol. 282:456–471), we found that 2–11 months after the unilateral cochlear lesion the map of the lesioned cochlea in the contralateral AI was altered so that the AI region in which frequencies with lesion‐induced elevations in cochlear neural sensitivity would have been represented was occupied by an enlarged representation of lesion‐edge frequencies (i.e., frequencies adjacent to those with elevated cochlear neural sensitivity). Along the tonotopic axis of AI the total representation of lesion‐edge frequencies could extend up to ≈ 2.6 mm rostral to the area of normal representation of these frequencies. There was no topographic order within this enlarged representation. Examination of threshold sensitivity at the characteristic frequency (CF, frequency to which the neurons were most sensitive) in the reorganized regions of the map of the lesioned cochlea established that the changes in the map reflected a plastic reorganization rather than simply reflecting the residue of prelesion input. In contrast to the change in the map of the lesioned contralateral cochlea, the map of the unlesioned ipsilateral cochlea did not differ from those in normal animals. Thus, in contrast to the normal very good congreuency between ipsilateral and contralateral AI maps, in the lesioned animals ipsilateral and contralateral maps differed in the region of AI in which there had been a reorganization of the map of the lesioned cochlea. Outside the region of contralateral map reorganization, ipsilateral and contralateral AI maps remained congruent within normal limits. The difference between the two maps in the region of contralateral map reorganization suggested, in light of the physiology of binaural interactions in the auditory pathway, that the cortical reorganization reflected subcortical changes. Finally, response properties of neuronal clusters within the reorganized map of the lesioned cochlea were compared to normative data with respect to threshold sensitivity at CF, the size of frequency “response areas,” and response latencies. In the majority of cases, CF thresholds were similar to normative data. The frequency “response areas” were slightly less sharply tuned than normal, but not significantly. Response latencies were significantly shorter than normal in three animals and significantly longer in one animal. © 1993 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Recanzone, G., Schreiner, C., & Merzenich, M. (1993) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.13-01-00087.1993 · Cited by 1,266
Willott, J. F. (1986) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1986.56.2.391 · Cited by 211
Cited by
CORTICAL PLASTICITY: From Synapses to Maps
Buonomano, D. V., & Merzenich, M. M. (1998) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.21.1.149 · Cited by 2,083
Tuning Out the Noise: Limbic-Auditory Interactions in Tinnitus
Rauschecker, J. P., Leaver, A. M., & Mühlau, M. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.04.032 · Cited by 773
Compensatory plasticity and sensory substitution in the cerebral cortex
Rauschecker, J. P. (1995) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(95)93948-w · Cited by 590
Persistent and specific influences of early acoustic environments on primary auditory cortex
Zhang, L. I., Bao, S., & Merzenich, M. M. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn745 · Cited by 451
Syka, J. (2002) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00002.2002 · Cited by 369
Metadata
- Authors
- Rajan, R., Irvine, D. R. F., Wise, L. Z., & Heil, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-12
- Volume
- 338
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-49
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2090056181
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of unilateral partial cochlear lesions in adult cats on the representation of lesioned and unlesioned cochleas in primary auditory cortex. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.903380104
- The paper
- Rajan, R., Irvine, D. R. F., Wise, L. Z., & Heil, P. (1993). Effect of unilateral partial cochlear lesions in adult cats on the representation of lesioned and unlesioned cochleas in primary auditory cortex. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.903380104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.