Cited by 29

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcome of Drug‐Induced Liver Injury in the Older Patients: From the Young‐Old to the Oldest‐Old

Weersink, Rianne A., Alvarez‐Alvarez, Ismael, Medina‐Cáliz, Inmaculada, Sanabria‐Cabrera, Judith, Robles‐Díaz, Mercedes, Ortega‐Alonso, Aida, García‐Cortés, Miren, Bonilla, Elvira, Niu, Hao, Soriano, German, Jimenez‐Perez, Miguel, Hallal, Hacibe, Blanco, Sonia, Kaplowitz, Neil, Lucena, M. Isabel, Andrade, Raúl J.·2021·Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Older patients with hepatotoxicity have been scarcely studied in idiosyncratic drug‐induced liver injury (DILI) cohorts. We sought the distinctive characteristics of DILI in older patients across age groups. A total of 882 DILI patients included in the Spanish DILI Registry (33% ≥ 65 years) were categorized according to age: “young” (< 65 years); “young‐old” (65–74 years); “middle‐old” (75–84 years); and “oldest‐old” (≥ 85 years). All elderly groups had an increasingly higher comorbidity burden ( P < 0.001) and polypharmacy ( P < 0.001). There was a relationship between jaundice and hospitalization ( P < 0.001), and both were more prevalent in the older age groups, especially in the oldest‐old (88% and 69%, respectively), and the DILI episode was more severe ( P = 0.029). The proportion of females decreased across age groups from the young to the middle‐old, yet in the oldest‐old there was a distinct female predominance. Pattern of liver injury shifted towards cholestatic with increasing age among top culprit drugs amoxicillin‐clavulanate, atorvastatin, levofloxacin, ibuprofen, and ticlopidine. The best cutoff point for increased odds of cholestatic DILI was 65 years. Older patients had increased non–liver‐related mortality ( P = 0.030) as shown by the predictive capacity of the Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease score (odds ratio (OR) = 1.116; P < 0.001), and comorbidity burden (OR = 4.188; P = 0.001) in the 6‐month mortality. Older patients with DILI exhibited an increasingly predominant cholestatic phenotype across a range of culprit drugs, other than amoxicillin‐clavulanate, with increased non–liver‐related mortality and require a different approach to predict outcome. The oldest DILI patients exhibited a particular phenotype with more severe DILI episodes and need to be considered when stratifying older DILI populations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cpt.2108

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. He W., 2016, U.S. Census Bureau, International Population Reports, P95/16‐1, An Aging World: 2015
  2. 10.1056/NEJM199406233302509 · DOI
  3. 10.1124/pr.56.2.4 · DOI
  4. 10.1177/2042098610386281 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30006-6 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.04.026 · DOI
  7. 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.03.006 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1002/hep.22895 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/j.archger.2016.03.008 · DOI
  10. 10.1517/17425255.2015.1004310 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/B978-012369417-1/50064-X · DOI
  12. 10.1111/j.1872-034X.2009.00492.x · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.gastro.2005.05.006 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90129-5 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1038/clpt.2011.58 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.03.050 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.07.006 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1007/s11894-012-0299-8 · DOI
  19. 10.1080/03602530902722679 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1155/2011/526379 · DOI
  21. 10.1002/hep.29283 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1002/hep.21324 · DOI
  23. 10.1007/s10620-016-4121-6 · DOI
  24. 10.1371/journal.pone.0068111 · DOI
  25. 10.1002/hep.20215 · DOI
  26. 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.12.016 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.01.018 · DOI
  28. 10.1038/ajg.2015.283 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.05.003 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.09.007 · DOI
  31. 10.1007/978-3-319-90761-1_53-1 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.03.022 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Weersink, R. A., Alvarez‐Alvarez, I., Medina‐Cáliz, I., Sanabria‐Cabrera, J., Robles‐Díaz, M., Ortega‐Alonso, A., García‐Cortés, M., Bonilla, E., Niu, H., Soriano, G., Jimenez‐Perez, M., Hallal, H., Blanco, S., Kaplowitz, N., Lucena, M. I., & Andrade, R. J.
Venue
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-12-06
Volume
109
Issue
4
Pages
1147-1158
ISSN
  • 0009-9236
  • 1532-6535
Cited by
29
References
3
Language
en
Funders
  • European Cooperation in Science and Technology
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  • European Regional Development Fund (PI 18/01804, PT17/0017/0020)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review