Cited by 34Dental materials and restorationsdental development and anomaliesDental Trauma and Treatments

Retrospective study of patients with amelogenesis imperfecta treated with different bonded restoration techniques

Open access
Ohrvik, Hanne G., Hjortsjö, Carl·2020·Clinical and Experimental Dental Research

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate clinical success and satisfaction of patients with amelogenesis imperfecta treated with three different types of bonded restorations at a university clinic. Materials and Methods: One hundred fifty‐four restorations in 15 subjects with mean age of 17.3 years (SD 8.2) were evaluated after treatment with three different types of bonded restorations: all ceramic enamel‐dentin bonded restorations, prefabricated composite veneers, and direct composite resin restorations. A modified version of the Californian Dental Association system for quality evaluation of dental care and a questionnaire assessing patient satisfaction were used for classification. The restorations were evaluated with respect to patient satisfaction, esthetics, technical, and biological complications. Results: Mean observation period for the restorations was 42.5 months (SD 35.6). All restorations were in place at the time of the examination. Surface and color calibration showed a success of 95% for the ceramic enamel‐dentin bonded restorations, 44% for the direct composite resin restorations, and 0% for the prefabricated composite veneers. The same pattern was evident for anatomy and marginal integrity. The subjects reported a high degree of satisfaction with both the esthetics and function of their restorations. Conclusion: The results indicated that all ceramic restorations demonstrated the best results for patients with amelogenesis imperfecta.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cre2.243

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 21 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ohrvik, H. G., & Hjortsjö, C.
Affiliations
University of Oslo (NO)
Corresponding author
Hjortsjö, Carl
Venue
Clinical and Experimental Dental Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-08-30
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
16-23
ISSN
2057-4347 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2970367570
Cited by
34
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical and Experimental Dental Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Dental materials and restorations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › dental development and anomalies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Dental Trauma and Treatments
Keywords
amelogenesis imperfecta, adhesive restorations, all-ceramic restorations, direct composite restoration, restoration success, patient satisfaction, aesthetics, marginal adaptation, dental aesthetics
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Amelogenesis Imperfecta, Ceramics, Child, Child, Preschool, Composite Resins, Dental Veneers, Esthetics, Dental, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Resin Cements, Young Adult, Dental Restoration Repair

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review