The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sustainable human resource management and employee engagement: A holistic assessment instrument
Open accessAbstract
Faced with the need to develop more responsible models of human resource management (HRM), the aim of this research is to develop a measurement instrument that allows the systematic assessment of sustainable HRM systems. The research provides a comprehensive framework of analysis for evaluating HRM sustainability by relying on the sustainability approach. The article proposes an evaluation of sustainable HRM systems per their balanced application of corporate social responsibility (CSR) principles. The research identifies the different CSR dimensions that characterize sustainable HRM systems, creates the measurement instrument, and theoretically—through a Delphi study—and empirically validates this measure on a sample of European firms.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Organizations that offer career progression opportunities and fair compensation structures tend to experience lower turnover rates (Diaz -Carrion et al., 2020).”
From Evaluation of the Sustainability of Organizational Welfare and Human Resources to Improving Long-Term Performance (2025) · cites this paper as Diaz-Carrion et al., 2020
In the citing paper
“The conflict between short-term financial goals and long-term workforce sustainability investments is a primary obstacle.”
From Evaluation of the Sustainability of Organizational Welfare and Human Resources to Improving Long-Term Performance (2025) · cites this paper as Diaz-Carrion et al., 2020
In the citing paper
“Many organizations prioritize immediate profitability over employee well-being, resulting in reduced investments in training, career development, and welfare programs (Diaz-Carrion et al., 2020).”
From Evaluation of the Sustainability of Organizational Welfare and Human Resources to Improving Long-Term Performance (2025) · cites this paper as Diaz-Carrion et al., 2020
Citations
Cites
The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus
Hsu, C.-C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007) · University of Massachusetts Amherst · doi:10.7275/pdz9-th90 · Cited by 4,500
Revisiting the Quantitative-Qualitative Debate: Implications for Mixed-Methods Research
Sale, J. E. M., Lohfeld, L. H., & Brazil, K. (2002) · Quality and Quantity · doi:10.1023/a:1014301607592 · Cited by 1,082
Ehnert, I., Parsa, S., Roper, I., Wagner, M., & Muller-Camen, M. (2016) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2015.1024157 · Cited by 585
The Worldwide Diffusion of the Global Reporting Initiative: What Is the Point?
Marimon, F., Alonso-Almeida, M. D. M., Rodríguez, M. D. P., & Cortez Alejandro, K. A. (2012) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.04.017 · Cited by 332
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- Astigarraga E., 2005, El método Delphi
- 10.4337/9781784711139.00026 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/10301763.2013.769847 · DOI
- 10.1002/csr.1658 · DOI
- 10.3917/rips.033.0077 · DOI
- Blumberg B., 2008, Business research methods
- 10.1002/csr.1301 · DOI
- 10.1177/014662169401800302 · DOI
- 10.5771/0935-9915-2014-4-263 · DOI
- Diaz‐Carrion R., 2017, Social human resource management transparency in Europe: A cross‐country analysis, Universia Business Review, 54, 70
- 10.1002/csr.1528 · DOI
- 10.1177/1471082X0600700102 · DOI
- 10.5539/ibr.v6n12p145 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-7908-2188-8 · DOI · Paper page
- European Commission, 2003, Responsible entrepreneurship: A collection of good practice cases among small and medium‐sized enterprises across Europe
- Farrukh M., 2019, The perception of corporate social responsibility and employee engagement: Examining the underlying mechanism, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26, 1
- 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.08.005 · DOI
- 10.1177/002224378101800313 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.scaman.2008.10.003 · DOI
- 10.1111/beer.12085 · DOI
- Majid A., 2019, Nexus of institutional pressures, environmentally friendly business strategies, and environmental performance, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26
- 10.1002/csr.1471 · DOI
- 10.1177/0007650305281939 · DOI
- 10.1108/14720700610689496 · DOI
- Nair R. S., 2015, A review of the cause‐effect relationship between CSR and HR, The International Journal of Business & Management, 3, 63
- Nunnally J. C., 1994, Validity, Psychometric Theory, 3, 99
- 10.1002/csr.1765 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.09.005 · DOI
- 10.1177/0149206314522300 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02894611 · DOI
- Vogt W. P., 1999, Dictionary of statistics and methodology: A nontechnical guide for the social sciences
- 10.1007/s10551-006-9094-5 · DOI
- 10.1002/csr.139 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
R.A, R. A., Hardy, H., Asrul, A., Maslim, M., & Megawaty, M. (2025) · PARADOKS Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi · doi:10.57178/paradoks.v8i2.1157 · Cited by 3
“Organizations that offer career progression opportunities and fair compensation structures tend to experience lower turnover rates (Diaz ‐ Carrion et al., 2020).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Diaz‐Carrion, R., López‐Fernández, M., & Romero‐Fernandez, P. M.
- Affiliations
- Faculty of Tourism and Finance, Department of Business Management and Marketing The University of Seville Seville Spain
- Universidad de Cádiz (ES)
- Economics and Business Faculty, Department of Business Organization The University of Cadiz Cadiz Spain
- Venue
- Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-03-03
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1749-1760
- ISSN
- 1535-3958 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-3966
- OpenAlex
- W3009573855
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 4.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- public-domain
- onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
- Locations
- Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management (publishedVersion)
- Deposito de Investigacion Universidad de Sevilla (University of Seville) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- RODIN (Universidad de Cádiz) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
- Keywords
- sustainable human resource management, employee engagement, scale development, corporate social responsibility, CSR dimensions, European firms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
