The DOI matches its Crossref record; 103 of the 103 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Greenwashing behavior and firm value – From the perspective of board characteristics
Open accessAbstract
With increasing environmental pressures on companies, they are beginning to disclose corporate social responsibility reports actively. However, some studies point to greenwashing in corporate social reporting as a cause for concern. Our study aims to uncover the board's role in the relationship between greenwashing and firm value. Using a two‐way fixed effects model and a series of robustness tests, our findings suggest that greenwashing increases firm value. We introduce board diversity to answer the question of who is driving greenwashing behavior. Female directors, age diversity, educational background, and shareholder aggregation inhibit greenwashing behavior, while local directors and political connections promote this effect. Greenwashing increases firm value by improving the quality of disclosure, stakeholder concerns and alleviating financing constraints. Finally, greenwashing has greater economic performance for heavily polluting firms, firms audited by the Big 4 and firms with mandatory disclosure. This study provides rich empirical findings for boards and greenwashing behavior, offering novel theoretical insights to promote substantive CSR and board governance in developing countries such as China.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Do Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities Provide Useful Measures of Financing Constraints?
Kaplan, S. N., & Zingales, L. (1997) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355397555163 · Cited by 6,770
Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance☆
Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007 · Cited by 5,711
Upper Echelons Theory: An Update
Hambrick, D. C. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.24345254 · Cited by 4,911
Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2007.05.003 · Cited by 3,570
Delmas, M. A., & Burbano, V. C. (2011) · California Management Review · doi:10.1525/cmr.2011.54.1.64 · Cited by 3,441
Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Satisfaction, and Market Value
Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.70.4.001 · Cited by 3,439
A Simple Approximation of Tobin's q
Chung, K. H., & Pruitt, S. W. (1994) · Financial Management · doi:10.2307/3665623 · Cited by 2,460
ADAMS, R. B., & FERREIRA, D. (2007) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01206.x · Cited by 2,401
Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Financial Performance
Campbell, K., & Mínguez-Vera, A. (2008) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9630-y · Cited by 2,209
Prescriptive Gender Stereotypes and Backlash Toward Agentic Women
Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00239 · Cited by 1,855
Cited by
Chen, S., Song, Y., & Gao, P. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118829 · Cited by 789
Sneideriene, A., & Legenzova, R. (2025) · Research in International Business and Finance · doi:10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102720 · Cited by 150
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, P., & Dagestani, A. A.
- Venue
- Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-03-26
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2330-2343
- ISSN
- 1535-3958 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-3966
- OpenAlex
- W4361011471
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 103
- FWCI
- 58.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Greenwashing behavior and firm value – From the perspective of board characteristics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/csr.2488
- The paper
- Chen, P., & Dagestani, A. A. (2023). Greenwashing behavior and firm value – From the perspective of board characteristics. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2488
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.