The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stakeholders' Influences on Corporate Green Innovation Strategy: A Case Study of Manufacturing Firms in China
Abstract
Facing the challenge of environmental degradation in China, a growing number of firms have begun to integrate environmental management systems into their business strategies and develop green innovation strategies. Based on the stakeholder theory, this paper attempts to explore the influences of stakeholders on the implementation of green process and green product innovation. Empirical results show that foreign customers play a significant role in driving companies to adopt strategy of green process and green product innovation. For foreign‐invested enterprises, the effect is limited to the adoption of green process innovation. It further reveals that community stakeholders and regulatory stakeholders have no significant effect on the corporate green process and green product innovation. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship
Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. V. D. (1995) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.9.4.97 · Cited by 13,365
WHY COMPANIES GO GREEN: A MODEL OF ECOLOGICAL RESPONSIVENESS.
Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/1556363 · Cited by 4,020
Redefining innovation — eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics
Rennings, K. (2000) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(99)00112-3 · Cited by 3,226
Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: The mediating effect of training
Sarkis, J., Gonzalez‐Torre, P., & Adenso‐Diaz, B. (2010) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2009.10.001 · Cited by 1,518
Banerjee, S. B. (2001) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00246 · Cited by 538
Hall, J., & Wagner, M. (2012) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.728 · Cited by 227
Cited by
ESG disclosure and financial performance: Moderating role of ESG investors
Chen, Z., & Xie, G. (2022) · International Review of Financial Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102291 · Cited by 986
Green Product Innovation: Where we are and Where we are Going
Dangelico, R. M. (2016) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1886 · Cited by 676
The moderating effect of environmental dynamism on green product innovation and performance
Chan, H. K., Yee, R. W. Y., Dai, J., & Lim, M. K. (2016) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.12.006 · Cited by 490
Zhang, F., & Zhu, L. (2019) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2298 · Cited by 485
Shahzad, M., Qu, Y., Javed, S. A., Zafar, A. U., & Rehman, S. U. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119938 · Cited by 478
Metadata
- Authors
- Guoyou, Q., Saixing, Z., Chiming, T., Haitao, Y., & Hailiang, Z.
- Venue
- Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-12-05
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-14
- ISSN
- 1535-3958 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-3966
- OpenAlex
- W2158511051
- Cited by
- 413
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 25.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stakeholders' Influences on Corporate Green Innovation Strategy: A Case Study of Manufacturing Firms in China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/csr.283
- The paper
- Guoyou, Q., Saixing, Z., Chiming, T., Haitao, Y., & Hailiang, Z. (2013). Stakeholders' Influences on Corporate Green Innovation Strategy: A Case Study of Manufacturing Firms in China. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.283
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
