The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adsorbent Materials for Carbon Dioxide Capture from Large Anthropogenic Point Sources
Abstract
Since the time of the industrial revolution, the atmospheric CO 2 concentration has risen by nearly 35 % to its current level of 383 ppm. The increased carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere has been suggested to be a leading contributor to global climate change. To slow the increase, reductions in anthropogenic CO 2 emissions are necessary. Large emission point sources, such as fossil‐fuel‐based power generation facilities, are the first targets for these reductions. A benchmark, mature technology for the separation of dilute CO 2 from gas streams is via absorption with aqueous amines. However, the use of solid adsorbents is now being widely considered as an alternative, potentially less‐energy‐intensive separation technology. This Review describes the CO 2 adsorption behavior of several different classes of solid carbon dioxide adsorbents, including zeolites, activated carbons, calcium oxides, hydrotalcites, organic–inorganic hybrids, and metal‐organic frameworks. These adsorbents are evaluated in terms of their equilibrium CO 2 capacities as well as other important parameters such as adsorption–desorption kinetics, operating windows, stability, and regenerability. The scope of currently available CO 2 adsorbents and their critical properties that will ultimately affect their incorporation into large‐scale separation processes is presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Millward, A. R., & Yaghi, O. M. (2005) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0570032 · Cited by 2,876
Advances in CO2 capture technology—The U.S. Department of Energy's Carbon Sequestration Program
Figueroa, J. D., Fout, T., Plasynski, S., McIlvried, H., & Srivastava, R. D. (2008) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/s1750-5836(07)00094-1 · Cited by 2,281
The preparation of active carbons from coal by chemical and physical activation
Ahmadpour, A., & Do, D. D. (1996) · Carbon · doi:10.1016/0008-6223(95)00204-9 · Cited by 763
CO2 Sorption on MgO and CaO Surfaces: A Comparative Quantum Chemical Cluster Study
Jensen, M. B., Pettersson, L. G. M., Swang, O., & Olsbye, U. (2005) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp052037h · Cited by 169
Adsorption equilibria and kinetics of CO2, CH4 and N2 in natural zeolites
Hernández-Huesca, R., Dı́az, L., & Aguilar-Armenta, G. (1999) · Separation and Purification Technology · doi:10.1016/s1383-5866(98)00094-x · Cited by 167
Cited by
Metal–Organic Frameworks for Separations
Li, J.-R., Sculley, J., & Zhou, H.-C. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200190s · Cited by 6,323
Carbon capture and storage (CCS): the way forward
Bui, M., Adjiman, C. S., Bardow, A., Anthony, E. J., Boston, A., Brown, S., Fennell, P. S., Fuss, S., Galindo, A., Hackett, L. A., et al. (2018) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c7ee02342a · Cited by 4,374
Carbon Dioxide Capture: Prospects for New Materials
D'Alessandro, D. M., Smit, B., & Long, J. R. (2010) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201000431 · Cited by 4,046
Water Stability and Adsorption in Metal–Organic Frameworks
Burtch, N. C., Jasuja, H., & Walton, K. S. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr5002589 · Cited by 2,730
Direct Capture of CO2 from Ambient Air
Sanz-Pérez, E. S., Murdock, C. R., Didas, S. A., & Jones, C. W. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00173 · Cited by 2,406
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Choi, S., Drese, J. H., & Jones, C. W.
- Venue
- ChemSusChem
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-09-14
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 796-854
- ISSN
- 1864-5631 (ISSN-L)
- 1864-564X
- OpenAlex
- W2104943417
- Cited by
- 2,596
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 206.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.