The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Granular Bamboo‐Derived Activated Carbon for High CO2 Adsorption: The Dominant Role of Narrow Micropores
Abstract
Cost‐effective biomass‐derived activated carbons with a high CO 2 adsorption capacity are attractive for carbon capture. Bamboo was found to be a suitable precursor for activated carbon preparation through KOH activation. The bamboo size in the range of 10–200 mesh had little effect on CO 2 adsorption, whereas the KOH/C mass ratio and activation temperature had a significant impact on CO 2 adsorption. The bamboo‐derived activated carbon had a high adsorption capacity and excellent selectivity for CO 2, and also the adsorption process was highly reversible. The adsorbed amount of CO 2 on the granular activated carbon was up to 7.0 mmol g−1 at 273 K and 1 bar, which was higher than almost all carbon materials. The pore characteristics of activated carbons responsible for high CO 2 adsorption were fully investigated. Based on the analysis of narrow micropore size distribution of several activated carbons prepared under different conditions, a more accurate micropore range contributing to CO 2 adsorption was proposed. The volume of micropores in the range of 0.33–0.82 nm had a good linear relationship with CO 2 adsorption at 273 K and 1 bar, and the narrow micropores of about 0.55 nm produced the major contribution, which could be used to evaluate CO 2 adsorption on activated carbons.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Post-Combustion CO 2 Capture Using Solid Sorbents: A Review
Samanta, A., Zhao, A., Shimizu, G. K. H., Sarkar, P., & Gupta, R. (2012) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie200686q · Cited by 1,889
Sustainable porous carbons with a superior performance for CO2 capture
Sevilla, M., & Fuertes, A. B. (2011) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c0ee00784f · Cited by 1,088
Effect of pore size on carbon dioxide sorption by carbide derived carbon
Presser, V., McDonough, J., Yeon, S.-H., & Gogotsi, Y. (2011) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c1ee01176f · Cited by 668
Palomino, M., Corma, A., Rey, F., & Valencia, S. (2010) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la9026656 · Cited by 289
CO2 Capture in Different Carbon Materials
Jiménez, V., Ramírez-Lucas, A., Díaz, J. A., Sánchez, P., & Romero, A. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es2046553 · Cited by 158
Plaza, M. G., García, S., Rubiera, F., Pis, J. J., & Pevida, C. (2011) · Separation and Purification Technology · doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2011.04.015 · Cited by 100
Cited by
Development of biochar-based functional materials: toward a sustainable platform carbon material
Liu, W.-J., Jiang, H., & Yu, H.-Q. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00195 · Cited by 1,754
Li, X., Zhang, L., Yang, Z., Wang, P., Yan, Y., & Ran, J. (2020) · Separation and Purification Technology · doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2019.116213 · Cited by 1,048
Recent advances in carbon capture storage and utilisation technologies: a review
Osman, A. I., Hefny, M., Abdel Maksoud, M. I. A., Elgarahy, A. M., & Rooney, D. W. (2021) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-020-01133-3 · Cited by 862
A review on solid adsorbents for carbon dioxide capture
Lee, S.-Y., & Park, S.-J. (2015) · Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jiec.2014.09.001 · Cited by 707
Biomass derived porous carbon for CO2 capture
Singh, G., Lakhi, K. S., Sil, S., Bhosale, S. V., Kim, I., Albahily, K., & Vinu, A. (2019) · Carbon · doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2019.03.050 · Cited by 555
Metadata
- Authors
- Wei, H., Deng, S., Hu, B., Chen, Z., Wang, B., Huang, J., & Yu, G.
- Venue
- ChemSusChem
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-11-06
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2354-2360
- ISSN
- 1864-5631 (ISSN-L)
- 1864-564X
- OpenAlex
- W2006876915
- Cited by
- 421
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 26.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
