Cited by 39Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsIron oxide chemistry and applications

Electrolyte Engineering for Oxygen Evolution Reaction Over Non‐Noble Metal Electrodes Achieving High Current Density in the Presence of Chloride Ion

Open access
Komiya, Hiroki, Shinagawa, Tatsuya, Takanabe, Kazuhiro·2022·ChemSusChem

Abstract

Direct seawater electrolysis potentially simplifies the electrolysis process and leads to a decrease in the cost of green hydrogen production. However, impurities present in the seawater, especially chloride ions (Cl − ), cause corrosion of the electrode material, and its oxidation competes with the anodic oxygen evolution reaction (OER). By carefully tuning electrode substrate and electrolyte solutions, the CoFeO x H y /Ti electrode with high double‐layer capacitance actively and stably electro‐catalyzed the OER in potassium borate solutions at pH 9.2 in the presence of 0.5 mol kg −1 Cl − . The electrode possesses an active site motif composed of either a Co‐ or Fe‐domain and benefits from an enlarged surface area. Selective OER was demonstrated in Cl − ‐containing electrolyte solutions at an elevated reaction temperature, stably achieving 500 mA cm −2 at a mere potential of 1.67 V vs. reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) at 353 K for multiple on‐off and long‐term testing processes with a faradaic efficiency of unity toward the OER.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cssc.202201088

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Structural instability of non-precious 3d transition metal-based HER electrocatalysts under practical environments, particularly seawater, remains a major challenge.

    “These species accelerate catalyst corrosion, trigger uncontrolled surface passivation, and lead to structural collapse, thereby severely limiting the durability of most non-noble metal catalysts.”

    From Environment-responsive phase transformation of Ni-modified cobalt phosphate aerogels for durable hydrogen evolution in freshwater and seawater (2026) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Introduction says seawater impurities can cause hydroxide deposits that block and degrade HER cathode sites. The Results and Discussion also reports chloride-induced corrosion of a nickel-foam anode. The paper does not establish uncontrolled surface passivation or structural collapse, nor does it show that these effects limit the durability of most non-noble-metal HER catalysts. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Seawater is a harsher electrolyte environment than freshwater due to the presence of chloride and other aggressive cations and anions.

    “However, seawater represents a harsh electrolyte environment than freshwater due to the presence of chloride, other aggressive cations and anions [20,21].”

    From Environment-responsive phase transformation of Ni-modified cobalt phosphate aerogels for durable hydrogen evolution in freshwater and seawater (2026) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Introduction describes seawater impurities as challenges for electrolysis: Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺ can cause cathode-blocking deposits, while chloride can lead to damaging oxidation products. This supports the claim that seawater presents a harsher electrolyte environment, but the cited passages do not identify aggressive anions other than chloride. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Chloride and other aggressive species in seawater accelerate catalyst corrosion, trigger uncontrolled surface passivation, and lead to structural collapse, severely limiting the durability of most non-noble metal catalysts.

    “These species accelerate catalyst corrosion, trigger uncontrolled surface passivation, and lead to structural collapse, thereby severely limiting the durability of most non-noble metal catalysts.”

    From Environment-responsive phase transformation of Ni-modified cobalt phosphate aerogels for durable hydrogen evolution in freshwater and seawater (2026) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Results and Discussion (Fabrication and conditioning of CoFeOxHy electrodes; page unavailable) report chloride-induced corrosion of nickel foam and a hydroxide precipitate on its surface. The Introduction also describes seawater impurities causing active-site blockage. The paper does not establish uncontrolled surface passivation or structural collapse, nor does it show that these effects severely limit the durability of most non-noble metal catalysts. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 68

  1. [1]M. F. Lagadec, A. Grimaud, Nat. Mater. 2020, 19, 1140– 1150. 33020614
  2. [2]Y. Nakajima, N. Fujimoto, S. Hasegawa, T. Usui, ECS Trans. 2017, 80, 835.
  3. [3]I. C. Karagiannis, P. G. Soldatos, Desalination 2008, 223, 448– 456.
  4. [4]C. J. Vorosmarty, P. Green, J. Salisbury, R. B. Lammers, Science 2000, 289, 284– 288. 10894773
  5. [5]C. J. Vörösmarty, P. B. McIntyre, M. O. Gessner, D. Dudgeon, A. Prusevich, P. Green, S. Glidden, S. E. Bunn, C. A. Sullivan, C. R. Liermann, Nature 2010, 467, 555– 561. 20882010
  6. [6]W. Tong, M. Forster, F. Dionigi, S. Dresp, R. Sadeghi Erami, P. Strasser, A. J. Cowan, P. Farràs, Nat. Energy 2020, 5, 367– 377.
  7. [7]L.-Q. Jiang, B. R. Carter, R. A. Feely, S. K. Lauvset, A. Olsen, Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 18624. 31819102 PMC6901524
  8. [8]E. M. Kapp, Biol. Bull. 1928, 55, 453– 458.
  9. [9]S. Dresp, F. Dionigi, S. Loos, J. Ferreira de Araujo, C. Spöri, M. Gliech, H. Dau, P. Strasser, Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1800338.
  10. [10]A. Kraft, M. Stadelmann, M. Blaschke, D. Kreysig, B. Sandt, F. Schroder, J. Rennau, J. Appl. Electrochem. 1999, 29, 861– 868.
  11. [11]J. G. Vos, M. T. M. Koper, J. Electroanal. Chem. 2018, 819, 260– 268.
  12. [12]K. Izumiya, E. Akiyama, H. Habazaki, N. Kumagai, A. Kawashima, K. Hashimoto, Electrochim. Acta 1998, 43, 3303– 3312.
  13. [13]K. Fujimura, K. Izumiya, A. Kawashima, E. Akiyama, H. Habazaki, N. Kumagai, K. Hashimoto, J. Appl. Electrochem. 1999, 29, 765– 771.
  14. [14]N. A. Abdel Ghany, N. Kumagai, S. Meguro, K. Asami, K. Hashimoto, Electrochim. Acta 2002, 48, 21– 28.
  15. [15]J. G. Vos, T. A. Wezendonk, A. W. Jeremiasse, M. T. Koper, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 10270– 10281. 30024752 PMC6099550
  16. [16]T. Okada, H. Abe, A. Murakami, T. Shimizu, K. Fujii, T. Wakabayashi, M. Nakayama, Langmuir 2020, 36, 5227– 5235. 32347730
  17. [17]S. Kumari, R. T. White, B. Kumar, J. M. Spurgeon, Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 1725– 1733.
  18. [18]F. Dionigi, T. Reier, Z. Pawolek, M. Gliech, P. Strasser, ChemSusChem 2016, 9, 962– 972. 27010750
  19. [19]D. Friebel, M. W. Louie, M. Bajdich, K. E. Sanwald, Y. Cai, A. M. Wise, M.-J. Cheng, D. Sokaras, T.-C. Weng, R. Alonso-Mori, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 1305– 1313. 25562406
  20. [20]M. W. Louie, A. T. Bell, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 12329– 12337. 23859025
  21. [21]J. Luo, J.-H. Im, M. T. Mayer, M. Schreier, M. K. Nazeeruddin, N.-G. Park, S. D. Tilley, H. J. Fan, M. Grätzel, Science 2014, 345, 1593– 1596. 25258076
  22. [22]D. G. Nocera, ChemSusChem 2009, 2, 387– 390. 19408259
  23. [23]Y. Surendranath, M. Dincǎ, D. G. Nocera, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 2615– 2620. 19183057
  24. [24]T. P. Keane, D. G. Nocera, ACS Omega 2019, 4, 12860– 12864. 31460412 PMC6690569
  25. [25]A. J. Esswein, Y. Surendranath, S. Y. Reece, D. G. Nocera, Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 499– 504.
  26. [26]M. Huynh, C. Shi, S. J. Billinge, D. G. Nocera, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 14887– 14904. 26574923
  27. [27]M. Dincă, Y. Surendranath, D. G. Nocera, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 10337– 10341. 20457931 PMC2890790
  28. [28]D. K. Bediako, Y. Surendranath, D. G. Nocera, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 3662– 3674. 23360238
  29. [29]M. Görlin, M. Gliech, J. F. de Araújo, S. Dresp, A. Bergmann, P. Strasser, Catal. Today 2016, 262, 65– 73.
  30. [30]A. Bergmann, T. E. Jones, E. M. Moreno, D. Teschner, P. Chernev, M. Gliech, T. Reier, H. Dau, P. Strasser, Nat. Catal. 2018, 1, 711– 719.
  31. [31]P. W. Menezes, A. Indra, D. González-Flores, N. R. Sahraie, I. Zaharieva, M. Schwarze, P. Strasser, H. Dau, M. Driess, ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 2017– 2027.
  32. [32]D. Strmcnik, M. Uchimura, C. Wang, R. Subbaraman, N. Danilovic, D. van der Vliet, A. P. Paulikas, V. R. Stamenkovic, N. M. Markovic, Nat. Chem. 2013, 5, 300– 306. 23511418
  33. [33]M. Auinger, I. Katsounaros, J. C. Meier, S. O. Klemm, P. U. Biedermann, A. A. Topalov, M. Rohwerder, K. J. Mayrhofer, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 16384– 16394. 21837326
  34. [34]K. Obata, L. Stegenburga, K. Takanabe, J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 21554– 21563.
  35. [35]T. Nishimoto, T. Shinagawa, T. Naito, K. Takanabe, ChemSusChem 2021, 14, 1554– 1564. 33481326 PMC8048901
  36. [36]T. Shinagawa, K. Takanabe, J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 1785– 1794.
  37. [37]T. Naito, T. Shinagawa, T. Nishimoto, K. Takanabe, ChemSusChem 2020, 13, 5921– 5933. 32875653 PMC7756658
  38. [38]T. Naito, T. Shinagawa, T. Nishimoto, K. Takanabe, ChemSusChem 2022, 15, e202102294. 34907667 PMC9306655
  39. [39]D. Strmcnik, M. Uchimura, C. Wang, R. Subbaraman, N. Danilovic, D. Van Der Vliet, A. P. Paulikas, V. R. Stamenkovic, N. M. Markovic, Nat. Chem. 2013, 5, 300– 306. 23511418
  40. [40]H. Nonaka, Y. Matsumura, J. Electroanal. Chem. 2002, 520, 101– 110.
  41. [41]F. Dionigi, P. Strasser, Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1600621.
  42. [42]H. Zhou, F. Yu, Q. Zhu, J. Sun, F. Qin, L. Yu, J. Bao, Y. Yu, S. Chen, Z. Ren, Energy Environ. Sci. 2018, 11, 2858– 2864.
  43. [43]X. Lu, C. Zhao, Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6616. 25776015 PMC4382694
  44. [44]X. Liu, X. Wang, X. Yuan, W. Dong, F. Huang, J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 167– 172.
  45. [45]J. Juodkazytė, B. Šebeka, I. Savickaja, M. Petrulevičienė, S. Butkutė, V. Jasulaitienė, A. Selskis, R. Ramanauskas, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 5929– 5939.
  46. [46]T. Ma, W. Xu, B. Li, X. Chen, J. Zhao, S. Wan, K. Jiang, S. Zhang, Z. Wang, Z. Tian, Z. Lu, L. Chen, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 22740– 22744; 34431193 Angew. Chem. 2019, 131, 13133– 13137.
  47. [47]Y. Kuang, M. J. Kenney, Y. Meng, W.-H. Hung, Y. Liu, J. E. Huang, R. Prasanna, P. Li, Y. Li, L. Wang, M.-C. Lin, M. D. McGehee, X. Sun, H. Dai, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 6624– 6629. 30886092 PMC6452679
  48. [48]A. Badreldin, A. Nabeeh, E. Youssef, N. Mubarak, H. ElSayed, R. Mohsen, F. Ahmed, Y. Wubulikasimu, K. Elsaid, A. Abdel-Wahab, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 4, 6942– 6956.
  49. [49]A. J. Esswein, Y. Surendranath, S. Y. Reece, D. G. Nocera, Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 499– 504.
  50. [50]M. S. Burke, M. G. Kast, L. Trotochaud, A. M. Smith, S. W. Boettcher, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 3638– 3648. 25700234
  51. [51]M. Aghazadeh, M. R. Ganjali, M. G. Maragheh, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2017, 12, 5792– 5803.
  52. [52]M. S. Burke, L. J. Enman, A. S. Batchellor, S. Zou, S. W. Boettcher, Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 7549– 7558.
  53. [53]J. R. S. Brownson, C. Lévy-Clément, Phys. Status Solidi B. 2008, 245, 1785– 1791.
  54. [55]U. M. Patil, R. V. Ghorpade, M. S. Nam, A. C. Nalawade, S. Lee, H. Han, S. C. Jun, Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 35490. 27762284 PMC5071864
  55. [56]Y.-C. Liu, J. A. Koza, J. A. Switzer, Electrochim. Acta 2014, 140, 359– 365.
  56. [57]A. C. Garcia, T. Touzalin, C. Nieuwland, N. Perini, M. T. Koper, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 12999– 13003; 31250499 Angew. Chem. 2019, 131, 13133– 13137.
  57. [59]R. D. L. Smith, C. Pasquini, S. Loos, P. Chernev, K. Klingan, P. Kubella, M. R. Mohammadi, D. Gonzalez-Flores, H. Dau, Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 2022. 29222428 PMC5722881
  58. [60]R. D. Smith, M. S. Prévot, R. D. Fagan, S. Trudel, C. P. Berlinguette, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 11580– 11586. 23883103
  59. [61]R. D. L. Smith, M. S. Prévot, R. D. Fagan, S. Trudel, C. P. Berlinguette, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 11580– 11586. 23883103
  60. [62]W. Xiang, N. Yang, X. Li, J. Linnemann, U. Hagemann, O. Ruediger, M. Heidelmann, T. Falk, M. Aramini, S. DeBeer, M. Muhler, K. Tschulik, T. Li, Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 179. 35013310 PMC8748757
  61. [63]S. Sasidharanpillai, H. Arcis, L. Trevani, P. R. Tremaine, J. Phys. Chem. B 2019, 123, 5147– 5159. 31181928
  62. [64]E. Budiyanto, S. Salamon, Y. Wang, H. Wende, H. Tüysüz, JACS Au 2022, 2, 697– 710. 35373196 PMC8970005
  63. [65]A. Moysiadou, S. Lee, C.-S. Hsu, H. M. Chen, X. Hu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 11901– 11914. 32539368
  64. [66]W. H. Lee, M. H. Han, Y.-J. Ko, B. K. Min, K. H. Chae, H.-S. Oh, Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 605. 35105874 PMC8807628
  65. [67]C. Pasquini, L. D'Amario, I. Zaharieva, H. Dau, J. Chem. Phys. 2020, 152, 194202. 33687254
  66. [68]M. Testa-Anta, M. A. Ramos-Docampo, M. Comesaña-Hermo, B. Rivas-Murias, V. Salgueiriño, Nanoscale Adv. 2019, 1, 2086– 2103. 36131987 PMC9418671
  67. [69]J. M. J. Santillán, D. Muñetón Arboleda, D. F. Coral, M. B. Fernández van Raap, D. Muraca, D. C. Schinca, L. B. Scaffardi, ChemPhysChem 2017, 18, 1192– 1209. 28295909
  68. [70]Z. Lu, W. Xu, W. Zhu, Q. Yang, X. Lei, J. Liu, Y. Li, X. Sun, X. Duan, Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 6479– 6482. 24817324

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Komiya, H., Shinagawa, T., & Takanabe, K.
Affiliations
The University of Tokyo (JP)
Corresponding author
Takanabe, Kazuhiro
Venue
ChemSusChem
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-09
Volume
15
Issue
19
Pages
e202201088-e202201088
ISSN
  • 1864-5631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1864-564X
OpenAlex
W4289711391
Cited by
39
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ChemSusChem (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Iron oxide chemistry and applications
Keywords
oxygen evolution reaction, seawater electrolysis, green hydrogen production, non-noble metal electrocatalysts, double-layer capacitance, electrode corrosion, high current density, Faradaic efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review