Design Criteria, Operating Conditions, and Nickel–Iron Hydroxide Catalyst Materials for Selective Seawater Electrolysis
Abstract
Seawater is an abundant water resource on our planet and its direct electrolysis has the advantage that it would not compete with activities demanding fresh water. Oxygen selectivity is challenging when performing seawater electrolysis owing to competing chloride oxidation reactions. In this work we propose a design criterion based on thermodynamic and kinetic considerations that identifies alkaline conditions as preferable to obtain high selectivity for the oxygen evolution reaction. The criterion states that catalysts sustaining the desired operating current with an overpotential <480 mV in alkaline pH possess the best chance to achieve 100 % oxygen/hydrogen selectivity. NiFe layered double hydroxide is shown to satisfy this criterion at pH 13 in seawater‐mimicking electrolyte. The catalyst was synthesized by a solvothermal method and the activity, surface redox chemistry, and stability were tested electrochemically in alkaline and near‐neutral conditions (borate buffer at pH 9.2) and under both fresh seawater conditions. The Tafel slope at low current densities is not influenced by pH or presence of chloride. On the other hand, the addition of chloride ions has an influence in the temporal evolution of the nickel reduction peak and on both the activity and stability at high current densities at pH 9.2. Faradaic efficiency close to 100 % under the operating conditions predicted by our design criteria was proven using in situ electrochemical mass spectrometry.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Challenges persist in H2 generation from seawater.
“Despite numerous research efforts to enhance the efficiency of seawater electrolysis, challenges persist in H 2 generation from seawater.[38,41,217,219]”
From Advances in Blue Energy Fuels: Harvesting Energy from Ocean for Self‐Powered Electrolysis (2025) · cites this paper as [219]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Direct Electrolytic Splitting of Seawater: Opportunities and Challenges
Dresp, S., Dionigi, F., Klingenhof, M., & Strasser, P. (2019) · ACS Energy Letters · doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.9b00220 · Cited by 1,272 · see citing works
Self-citationYu, L., Wu, L., McElhenny, B., Song, S., Luo, D., Zhang, F., Yu, Y., Chen, S., & Ren, Z. (2020) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d0ee00921k · Cited by 877 · see citing works
Dresp, S., Ngo Thanh, T., Klingenhof, M., Brückner, S., Hauke, P., & Strasser, P. (2020) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d0ee01125h · Cited by 459 · see citing works
Self-citationIs direct seawater splitting economically meaningful?
Hausmann, J. N., Schlögl, R., Menezes, P. W., & Driess, M. (2021) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d0ee03659e · Cited by 388 · see citing works
Tan, L., Yu, J., Wang, C., Wang, H., Liu, X., Gao, H., Xin, L., Liu, D., Hou, W., & Zhan, T. (2022) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.202200951 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
Principles of Designing Electrocatalyst to Boost Reactivity for Seawater Splitting
Liu, X., Chi, J., Mao, H., & Wang, L. (2023) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202301438 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Seawater electrocatalysis: activity and selectivity
Khatun, S., Hirani, H., & Roy, P. (2021) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/d0ta08709b · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Advances in Blue Energy Fuels: Harvesting Energy from Ocean for Self‐Powered Electrolysis
Ock, I. W., Yin, J., Wang, S., Zhao, X., Baik, J. M., & Chen, J. (2025) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202400563 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Harvesting energy from marine: Seawater electrolysis for hydrogen production
Zhang, W., Wei, Y., Li, J., & Xiao, H. (2024) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2024.132782 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Komiya, H., Shinagawa, T., & Takanabe, K. (2022) · ChemSusChem · doi:10.1002/cssc.202201088 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Yao, D., Liu, C., Zhang, Y., Wang, S., Nie, Y., Qiao, M., & Zhu, D. (2025) · Materials Today Catalysis · doi:10.1016/j.mtcata.2025.100089 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dionigi, F., Reier, T., Pawolek, Z., Gliech, M., & Strasser, P.
- Affiliations
- Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Strasser, Peter
- Venue
- ChemSusChem
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-03-24
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 962-972
- ISSN
- 1864-5631 (ISSN-L)
- 1864-564X
- OpenAlex
- W2304799491
- Cited by
- 912
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 135 · 2025: 165 · 2024: 175 · 2023: 148 · 2022: 104 · 2021: 92 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5
- FWCI
- 4.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ChemSusChem (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Federal Ministry of Education and Research
- Federal Ministry of Economy and Energy (03SF0433A)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Iron oxide chemistry and applications
- Keywords
- seawater electrolysis, oxygen evolution reaction, oxygen selectivity, nickel-iron layered double hydroxide, alkaline water electrolysis, chloride interference, overpotential, catalyst stability, nickel reduction, borate buffer, Faradaic efficiency
- MeSH terms
- Catalysis, Chlorides, Electrolysis, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Hydroxides, Iron, Nickel, Seawater
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review