Cited by 912Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsIron oxide chemistry and applications

Design Criteria, Operating Conditions, and Nickel–Iron Hydroxide Catalyst Materials for Selective Seawater Electrolysis

Dionigi, Fabio, Reier, Tobias, Pawolek, Zarina, Gliech, Manuel, Strasser, Peter·2016·ChemSusChem

Abstract

Seawater is an abundant water resource on our planet and its direct electrolysis has the advantage that it would not compete with activities demanding fresh water. Oxygen selectivity is challenging when performing seawater electrolysis owing to competing chloride oxidation reactions. In this work we propose a design criterion based on thermodynamic and kinetic considerations that identifies alkaline conditions as preferable to obtain high selectivity for the oxygen evolution reaction. The criterion states that catalysts sustaining the desired operating current with an overpotential <480 mV in alkaline pH possess the best chance to achieve 100 % oxygen/hydrogen selectivity. NiFe layered double hydroxide is shown to satisfy this criterion at pH 13 in seawater‐mimicking electrolyte. The catalyst was synthesized by a solvothermal method and the activity, surface redox chemistry, and stability were tested electrochemically in alkaline and near‐neutral conditions (borate buffer at pH 9.2) and under both fresh seawater conditions. The Tafel slope at low current densities is not influenced by pH or presence of chloride. On the other hand, the addition of chloride ions has an influence in the temporal evolution of the nickel reduction peak and on both the activity and stability at high current densities at pH 9.2. Faradaic efficiency close to 100 % under the operating conditions predicted by our design criteria was proven using in situ electrochemical mass spectrometry.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cssc.201501581

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dionigi, F., Reier, T., Pawolek, Z., Gliech, M., & Strasser, P.
Affiliations
Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
Strasser, Peter
Venue
ChemSusChem
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-03-24
Volume
9
Issue
9
Pages
962-972
ISSN
  • 1864-5631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1864-564X
OpenAlex
W2304799491
Cited by
912
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 135 · 2025: 165 · 2024: 175 · 2023: 148 · 2022: 104 · 2021: 92 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5
FWCI
4.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ChemSusChem (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Federal Ministry of Education and Research
  • Federal Ministry of Economy and Energy (03SF0433A)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Iron oxide chemistry and applications
Keywords
seawater electrolysis, oxygen evolution reaction, oxygen selectivity, nickel-iron layered double hydroxide, alkaline water electrolysis, chloride interference, overpotential, catalyst stability, nickel reduction, borate buffer, Faradaic efficiency
MeSH terms
Catalysis, Chlorides, Electrolysis, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Hydroxides, Iron, Nickel, Seawater

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review