The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A hybrid 3D watershed algorithm incorporating gradient cues and object models for automatic segmentation of nuclei in confocal image stacks
Open accessAbstract
Background: Automated segmentation of fluorescently‐labeled cell nuclei in 3D confocal microscope images is essential to many studies involving morphological and functional analysis. A common source of segmentation error is tight clustering of nuclei. There is a compelling need to minimize these errors for constructing highly automated scoring systems. Methods: A combination of two approaches is presented. First, an improved distance transform combining intensity gradients and geometric distance is used for the watershed step. Second, an explicit mathematical model for the anatomic characteristics of cell nuclei such as size and shape measures is incorporated. This model is constructed automatically from the data. Deliberate initial over‐segmentation of the image data is performed, followed by statistical model‐based merging. A confidence score is computed for each detected nucleus, measuring how well the nucleus fits the model. This is used in combination with the intensity gradient to control the merge decisions. Results: Experimental validation on a set of rodent brain cell images showed 97% concordance with the human observer and significant improvement over prior methods. Conclusions: Combining a gradient‐weighted distance transform with a richer morphometric model significantly improves the accuracy of automated segmentation and FISH analysis. Cytometry Part A 56A:23–36, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New stereological methods for counting neurons
West, M. J. (1993) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/0197-4580(93)90112-o · Cited by 940
Cited by
Improved Automatic Detection and Segmentation of Cell Nuclei in Histopathology Images
Al-Kofahi, Y., Lassoued, W., Lee, W., & Roysam, B. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2009.2035102 · Cited by 681
Self-citationBioimage informatics: a new area of engineering biology
Peng, H. (2008) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn346 · Cited by 346
Bias‐free Measurement of Giant Molecular Cloud Properties
Rosolowsky, E., & Leroy, A. (2006) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/502982 · Cited by 334
High-throughput histopathological image analysis via robust cell segmentation and hashing
Zhang, X., Xing, F., Su, H., Yang, L., & Zhang, S. (2015) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2015.10.005 · Cited by 87
Mapping fetal brain development based on automated segmentation and 4D brain atlasing
Li, H., Yan, G., Luo, W., Liu, T., Wang, Y., Liu, R., Zheng, W., Zhang, Y., Li, K., Zhao, L., et al. (2021) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-021-02303-x · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, G., Adiga, U., Olson, K., Guzowski, J. F., Barnes, C. A., & Roysam, B.
- Venue
- Cytometry Part A
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-10-09
- Volume
- 56A
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 23-36
- ISSN
- 1552-4922 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4930
- OpenAlex
- W2076927398
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A hybrid 3D watershed algorithm incorporating gradient cues and object models for automatic segmentation of nuclei in confocal image stacks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cyto.a.10079
- The paper
- Lin, G., Adiga, U., Olson, K., Guzowski, J. F., Barnes, C. A., & Roysam, B. (2003). A hybrid 3D watershed algorithm incorporating gradient cues and object models for automatic segmentation of nuclei in confocal image stacks. Cytometry Part A. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.10079
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.