Cited by 41Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesFetal and Pediatric Neurological DisordersAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Mapping fetal brain development based on automated segmentation and 4D brain atlasing

Open access
Li, Haotian, Yan, Guohui, Luo, Wanrong, Liu, Tingting, Wang, Yan, Liu, Ruibin, Zheng, Weihao, Zhang, Yi +5 more·2021·Brain Structure and Function

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Fetal brain MRI has become an important tool for in utero assessment of brain development and disorders. However, quantitative analysis of fetal brain MRI remains difficult, partially due to the limited tools for automated preprocessing and the lack of normative brain templates. In this paper, we proposed an automated pipeline for fetal brain extraction, super-resolution reconstruction, and fetal brain atlasing to quantitatively map in utero fetal brain development during mid-to-late gestation in a Chinese population. First, we designed a U-net convolutional neural network for automated fetal brain extraction, which achieved an average accuracy of 97%. We then generated a developing fetal brain atlas, using an iterative linear and nonlinear registration approach. Based on the 4D spatiotemporal atlas, we quantified the morphological development of the fetal brain between 23 and 36 weeks of gestation. The proposed pipeline enabled the fully automated volumetric reconstruction for clinically available fetal brain MRI data, and the 4D fetal brain atlas provided normative templates for the quantitative characterization of fetal brain development, especially in the Chinese population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00429-021-02303-x

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The lateral PFC is mostly involved in language and executive processing, while the orbitofrontal and medial PFC contribute to cognitive functioning and emotional control.

    “The lPFC is mostly involved in language and executive processing, while the oFC and mPFC are known to contribute to cognitive functioning and emotional control [1–4].”

    From Development of prefrontal cortex (2022) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) suggests that changes in the superior and frontal gyri may relate to higher-order functions, but it does not assign language, executive processing, cognition, or emotional control to the specified prefrontal regions. Searches for those functions and for lateral, orbitofrontal, and medial prefrontal cortex found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 64 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Serag, A., Kyriakopoulou, V., Rutherford, M., Edwards, A., Hajnal, J., Aljabar, P., . . . Rueckert, D. (2012). A multi-channel 4D probabilistic atlas of the developing brain: application to fetuses and neonates. Annals of the BMVA, 2012(3), 1-14.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, H., Yan, G., Luo, W., Liu, T., Wang, Y., Liu, R., Zheng, W., Zhang, Y., Li, K., Zhao, L., Limperopoulos, C., Zou, Y., & Wu, D.
Affiliations
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
  • Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University (CN)
  • First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University (CN)
  • Children's National (US)
Corresponding author
Wu, Dan
Venue
Brain Structure and Function
Published
2021-05-29
Volume
226
Issue
6
Pages
1961-1972
ISSN
  • 1863-2653 (ISSN-L)
  • 1863-2661
OpenAlex
W3164909817
Cited by
41
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Structure and Function (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (2018YFE0114600)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61801424, 81971606, 61801421, and 81971605)
  • Leading Innovation and Entrepreneurship Team of Zhejiang Province (202006140)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
fetal brain development, fetal brain MRI, automated brain segmentation, super-resolution reconstruction, volumetric reconstruction, U-Net, iterative registration, gestational age, Chinese population
MeSH terms
Brain, Female, Fetus, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Pregnancy, Fetal Development, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review