Cited by 93Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsTreatment of Major DepressionPsychological Treatments and Disorders

Short psychodynamic supportive psychotherapy, antidepressants, and their combination in the treatment of major depression: a mega-analysis based on three randomized clinical trials

Open access
de Maat, Saskia, Dekker, Jack, Schoevers, Robert, van Aalst, Gerda, Gijsbers-van Wijk, Cecile, Hendriksen, Marielle, Kool, Simone, Peen, Jaap +2 more·2008·Depression and Anxiety

Abstract

The efficacy of Short Psychodynamic Supportive Psychotherapy (SPSP) has not yet been compared with pharmacotherapy. A mega-analysis based on three original Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs) was performed. Patients with (mild to moderate) major depressive disorder were randomized in (24 weeks) SPSP (n = 97), pharmacotherapy (n = 45), or their combination (n = 171). Efficacy was assessed by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), Clinical Global Impression of Severity and of Improvement (CGI-S), the Symptom Checklist (SCL; depression subscale) and the Quality of Life Depression Scale (QLDS). Pearson chi(2) calculations were used to compare success rates. Analyses of covariance (ANCOVAs) were used to test inter-group differences. Success rates indicated that independent observers (HDRS) found no differences in symptom reduction between SPSP and pharmacotherapy (P = 0.214), but therapists (CGI-S, P = 0.026), and patients (SCL, P = 0.036) favored SPSP. Combined therapy was found superior to pharmacotherapy by all three (patients (P = 0.000), therapists (P = 0.024), independent observers (P = 0.024)). Independent observers (P = 0.062) and therapists (P = 0.430) found no differences between combined therapy and SPSP, but patients (P = 0.016) found combined therapy to be superior. As far as quality of life is concerned, success rates indicated that patients (QLDS) found no differences between SPSP and pharmacotherapy (P = 0.073) or between SPSP and combined therapy (P = 0.217). However, they found combined therapy superior to pharmacotherapy (P = 0.015). The results of the mega-analysis suggest that combined therapy is more efficacious than pharmacotherapy. SPSP and pharmacotherapy seem equally efficacious, except for some indications that patients and therapists favor SPSP for symptom reduction. Combined therapy and SPSP also seem equally efficacious, except that patients think that the first is better in symptom reduction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/da.20305

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. de Maat et al. Depression and Anxiety 15206394, 2008, 7, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/da.20305 by Mount Vernon Nazarene University, Wiley Online Library on [30/08/2026]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Maat, S., Dekker, J., Schoevers, R., van Aalst, G., Gijsbers-van Wijk, C., Hendriksen, M., Kool, S., Peen, J., Van, R., & de Jonghe, F.
Affiliations
Mentrum (NL)
Corresponding author
Dekker, Jack
Venue
Depression and Anxiety
Published
2008-07
Volume
25
Issue
7
Pages
565-574
ISSN
  • 1091-4269 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6394
OpenAlex
W2133658031
Cited by
93
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
9.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Depression and Anxiety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Eli Lilly and Company
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Disorders
Keywords
antidepressants, major depressive disorder, combined psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy, treatment efficacy, quality of life, symptom relief
MeSH terms
Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Combined Modality Therapy, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Inventory, Psychoanalytic Therapy, Psychotherapy, Brief, Quality of Life, Social Support, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Patient Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review