Cited by 84Treatment of Major DepressionSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

Ketamine for acute suicidal ideation. An emergency department intervention: A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, proof‐of‐concept trial

Open access
Domany, Yoav, Shelton, Richard C., McCullumsmith, Cheryl B.·2020·Depression and Anxiety

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Depressed patients presenting to emergency departments with acute suicidal ideation are a major public health concern. Ketamine, a rapidly acting antidepressant with antisuicidal properties, might offer relief. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept trial, 18 depressed subjects with acute suicidal ideation, who required hospitalization, were randomized to either an intravenous ketamine 0.2 mg/kg group or a saline placebo group. Safety and efficacy evaluations were scheduled for 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, and 240 min, and on Days 1, 2, 3, 7, and 14 after infusion. The main outcome measure was suicidal ideation with secondary measures of depression. RESULTS: Nine subjects were randomized to each group. There were no differences between groups at baseline in any demographic or assessment scales. A reduction in suicidal ideation was noted at 90-180 min (p < .05). Ninety minutes after infusion, 88% of the ketamine group had achieved remission of suicidal ideation compared with 33% in the placebo group (p < .05). No serious adverse events were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Ketamine was safe and effective for rapid reduction in suicidal ideation in depressed, highly suicidal subjects presenting to the emergency department. Our results support further study of ketamine for acute suicidal ideation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/da.22975

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ketamine reduced suicidal ideation within 1-4 hours in major depression.

    “Ketamine, an NMDA glutamate receptor antagonist, reduced suicidal ideation within 1–4 hours in major depression(71–75) and bipolar disorder.(76, 77)”

    From Improving Suicide Prevention Through Evidence-Based Strategies: A Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as [74]

    The Suicidal ideation results (section 3.2; page unavailable) report that ketamine alleviated suicidal ideation 90–180 minutes after infusion, within the claimed 1–4-hour window. But the Participants section (2.1; page unavailable) includes major depression alongside bipolar depression, depression NOS, and dysthymia; the reported effect is for the combined group, not specifically for patients with major depression. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Multiple studies have found high rates of remission of suicidal ideation after a single ketamine infusion in patients hospitalized for acute suicidal ideation.

    “Previous research echoes these results, with multiple studies finding high rates of remission for suicidal ideation after a single ketamine infusion in patients hospitalized for acute suicidal ideation [77][78][79].”

    From Ketamine in neuropsychiatric disorders: an update (2024) · cites this paper as [77]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [10]10. Bokor, G., & Anderson, P. D. (2014). Ketamine: An update on its abuse. Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 27(6), 582-586. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0897190014525754

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Domany, Y., Shelton, R. C., & McCullumsmith, C. B.
Affiliations
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • University of Toledo (US)
Corresponding author
Domany, Yoav
Venue
Depression and Anxiety
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-11-16
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
224-233
ISSN
  • 1091-4269 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6394
OpenAlex
W2986872227
Cited by
84
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4
FWCI
5.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Depression and Anxiety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
ketamine, suicidal ideation, depression, emergency department, rapid-acting antidepressants, antisuicidal effects, intravenous infusion, treatment safety
MeSH terms
Major Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Emergency Service, Hospital, Humans, Ketamine, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review