Cited by 645Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbusePersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Clinical and psychosocial predictors of suicide attempts and nonsuicidal self-injury in the Adolescent Depression Antidepressants and Psychotherapy Trial (ADAPT)

Wilkinson, Paul, Kelvin, Raphael, Roberts, Chris, Dubicka, Bernadka, Goodyer, Ian·2011·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors assessed whether clinical and psychosocial factors in depressed adolescents at baseline predict suicide attempts and nonsuicidal self-injury over 28 weeks of follow-up. METHOD: Participants were 164 adolescents with major depressive disorder taking part in the Adolescent Depression Antidepressants and Psychotherapy Trial (ADAPT). Clinical symptoms, family function, quality of current personal friendships, and suicidal and nonsuicidal self-harm were assessed at baseline. Suicidal and nonsuicidal self-harm thoughts and behaviors were assessed during 28 weeks of follow-up. RESULTS: High suicidality, nonsuicidal self-injury, and poor family function at entry were significant independent predictors of suicide attempts over the 28 weeks of follow-up. Nonsuicidal self-injury over the follow-up period was independently predicted by nonsuicidal self-injury, hopelessness, anxiety disorder, and being younger and female at entry. CONCLUSIONS: Both suicidal and nonsuicidal self-harm persisted in depressed adolescents receiving treatment in the ADAPT study. A history of nonsuicidal self-injury prior to treatment is a clinical marker for subsequent suicide attempts and should be as carefully assessed in depressed youths as current suicidal intent and behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10050718

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilkinson, P., Kelvin, R., Roberts, C., Dubicka, B., & Goodyer, I.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2011-05
Volume
168
Issue
5
Pages
495-501
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2118162214
Cited by
645
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 57 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 34
FWCI
48.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
suicide attempts, non-suicidal self-injury, adolescent depression, major depressive disorder, family functions, hopelessness, anxiety disorders, suicidal ideation, ADAPT trial, antidepressants, psychotherapy
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Combined Modality Therapy, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Suicide, Attempted, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Chi-Square Distribution, Logistic Models, Self-Injurious Behavior, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation, Statistics, Nonparametric, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review