Cited by 13Tuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyDiagnosis and treatment of tuberculosisLymphadenopathy Diagnosis and Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Autofluorescence—an important ancillary technique for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Revisited

Abstract

Tuberculosis is one of the oldest diseases known to affect humans and is caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Lymph nodes are the most common site of extrapulmonary involvement. Tuberculous lymphadenitis can be presumptively diagnosed morphologically on fine‐needle aspiration biopsy of lymph nodes. Additional tests like Ziehl‐Neelsen (ZN) stain for detection of acid fast bacilli, fluorescence, and molecular markers are often employed for confirmation of diagnosis. However, culture is essential for obtaining a definitive diagnosis. Unfortunately, culture is time consuming and expensive. Newer investigative methods are required. The efficacy of autofluorescence in the diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis was evaluated for this purpose. Fine‐needle aspiration biopsies were collected from patients with a clinical diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis. Cytomorphological examination, ZN staining, autofluorescence, and culture were performed on all specimens. ZN staining was positive in 37.5% (30/80) of cases, while autofluorescence was positive in 57.5% (46/80) of patients and was found to have 81.8% specificity, 95% sensitivity, and a positive predictive value of 82.6%. This technique allowed rapid and early diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis in a number of patients, permitting early institution of appropriate therapy. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2013;41:330–334. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/dc.21860

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. WHO, World Health Organization: Global tuberculosis control, surveillance, planning, financing

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Joshi, P., Singh, M., Bhargava, A., Singh, M., & Mehrotra, R.
Affiliations
Motilal Nehru Medical College (IN)
Corresponding author
Mehrotra, Ravi
Venue
Diagnostic Cytopathology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-02-20
Volume
41
Issue
4
Pages
330-334
ISSN
  • 1097-0339 (ISSN-L)
  • 8755-1039
OpenAlex
W2078401180
Cited by
13
References
12
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diagnostic Cytopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Lymphadenopathy Diagnosis and Analysis
Keywords
autofluorescence, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, tuberculous lymphadenitis, fine-needle aspiration, Ziehl-Neelsen staining, acid-fast bacilli, sensitivity and specificity, extrapulmonary tuberculosis, rapid diagnosis
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Culture Media, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Sensitivity and Specificity, Staining and Labeling, Tuberculosis, Lymph Node, Biopsy, Fine-Needle, Young Adult, Optical Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review